How to Cite this Article:

Ülker, B.,   Kanoğlu, A., & Özçevik, Ö. (2021). SIMURG_CITIES: Meta-Analysis for KPI's of Layer-Based Approach in Sustainability Assessment. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 5(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n2-5

 

 

D:\My Journal\Logo\kam logo.JPG Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs

                          2021, Volume 5, Number 1, pages 59– 76

 

 

SIMURG_CITIES: Meta-Analysis for KPI's of Layer-Based Approach in Sustainability Assessment

1 * PhD Candidate. Burcu Ülker Image result for research orcid, 2 Prof. Dr. Alaattin Kanoğlu  Image result for research orcid, 3 Prof. Dr. Özlem Özçevik Image result for research orcid

 

1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Kırklareli University, Turkey

2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Turkey

3 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

E-mail 1: burcuulker@klu.edu.tr, E-mail 2: alaattin.kanoglu@alanya.edu.tr

E-mail 3: ozceviko@itu.edu.tr

 

 

ARTICLE  INFO:

 

Article History:

Received 6 March 2020

Accepted 20 June 2020

Available online 5 July 2020

 

Keywords:

SIMURG_CITIES;

Performance-Based Design and Building;

Competitiveness;

Competition by Design;

Innovativeness;

Interoperability; KPIs;

Sustainability; Smart Cities;

Meta-Analysis.

 

ABSTRACT    D:\My Journal\papers\Vol 4 ISSUE 1\1 senem sadri Turkey\check for updates2020ijcua.tif

 

“SIMURG_CITIES” is the research and development project that is developed under the main project named SIMURG: “A performance-based and Sustainability-oriented Integration Model Using Relational database architecture to increase Global competitiveness of Turkish construction industry in industry 5.0 era”, is a relational database model that is currently being developed in a dissertation for performance-based development and assessment of sustainable and sophisticated solutions for the built environment. This study aims to analyze the key performance indicators (KPIs) at «Cities Level» for the smart city concept that is referred to as «Layers» in the master project. KPIs for the concept of a smart city are determined by using the meta-analysis technique. Hence, the three most reputable urban journals issued from 2017 through 2020 are reviewed in this study. In addition to this, models of smart city frameworks/assessment tools/KPIs are reviewed within the context of this paper; environment, economy, and governance were found to have domain themes on urban sustainability according to the literature review. Consequently, efficient and integrated urban management, environmental monitoring and management, public and social services of urban development, and sustainability are found to be the most important dimensions in urban and regional planning. SIMURG_CITIES evaluation models for urban projects can use the findings of this paper.

JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2021), 5(1), 59-76.

https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n1-5

www.ijcua.com

Copyright © 2021 Burcu Ülker, Alaattin Kanoğlu, Özlem Özçevik.

 


 


1. Introduction


With globalization, individuals living within the same community which has different demographics structures, and understanding of life have increased and also lifestyles and expectations of these individuals have changed. The characteristics of built environment-related value systems have differentiated utilizing individuals' age, culture, educational level, etc. Nevertheless, policymakers (individuals/companies/institutions/local authorities) have designed living spaces uniformly assuming there is a single type of individual according to their value systems. While policymakers are preparing urban policies, cities continue to grow depending on rent since there are no tools to help rational decision making and decision support systems that can be measured. At this point, performance-based design and building of built environments to evaluate alternatives in a comparative way seems to have increased attractiveness for individuals /companies /institutions / local authorities of policymakers. As a result of the examinations made, it has been concluded that the model which will be developed for the solution of the identified problem must include and reveal the components of the solution in the dimensions stated by Kanoğlu et al. (2018).

The United Nations (UN) assumed seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that are aimed to “stimulate action over the next 15 years in areas of critical importance for humanity and the planet” in the last publication of the global sustainable development agenda, “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. Features as part of the targets referred to 3rd goal on “good health and well-being”, 4th goal on “quality education”, 8th goal on “economic growth”, 9th goal on “innovation and infrastructure”, and 11th goal on “sustainable cities and human settlements” (United Nations, 2015). Sustainability is the main concept among those that can be achieved by the integrated use of the other key concepts which are innovation, competitiveness, competition by design, performance-based building production process, integration of building production processes and interoperability supported by BIM (Building Information Modelling) and information classification systems (Kanoğlu et al., 2018). These concepts seem to be the key factors to design an integrated model that increases the competitive advantage of the national construction industry in the global market. Additional concepts that are not of less importance compared with the first set are transparency, accountability, and consistency. What the individuals, institutions, companies, and society need in Turkey are the practical and accessible tools that provide these concepts at all levels of decision-making. The problem is the lack of these tools that allow the governments and municipalities to propose suitable identities defined by the concepts or “layers” such as historical/smart/green/slow/safe/resilience etc, that are presented by specific KPIs and associated weights, for their built environments at all levels and to develop consistent policies for this purpose that helps individuals in matching up their attributes with social, cultural, economic, educational, etc., characteristics of the built environment they are supposed to live. Many more sub-components such as management, planning, energy, transportation, infrastructure resources, etc. of cities are needed to make a sustainable performance-based assessment, as well as KPI’s set, should be determined from its parameters for the design to be aesthetic, compatible with user needs and functions.

SIMURG: “A performance-based and Sustainability-oriented Integration Model Using Relational database architecture to increase Global competitiveness of the Turkish construction industry in industry 5.0 era” is integrated with the subprojects conducted by Kanoğlu et al. (2018) within the SIMURG_ALKU&ITU Virtual Laboratory, established on the Research Gate Scientific Communication Platform (https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Alaattin_Kanoglu). Kanoğlu et al. (2018) designed the open-ended project that improvement for concerned models at all hierarchical levels of “performance-based design and construction” of the built environment manner in various sub-projects in two supplementary fields, i.e., “product” and “process” dimensions. “Building components”, “building elements”, “building premises”, “buildings”, “projects”, “lands”, “quarters”, “settlements”, “counties” and “cities” levels on “product side” and “operations”, “projects”, “departments”, “firms”, “groups of firms”, “sectors”, “national economies” and “global economy” levels on “process side” are the hierarchical levels of these dimensions. All the levels are required, specific KPIs and weights are determined together with organisational, computational, and computer models are designed. SIMURG_CITIES, the relational database model that is currently being conducted by Ülker under the supervision of Kanoğlu et al. (2018) in her dissertation entitled SIMURG_CITIES: “A Performance-Based Integrated Model for Design and Evaluation of Sustainable and Sophisticated Solutions at Cities Level: Determination of Key Performance Indicators and Principles of Model at Conceptual Dimension”. The main goal of the project is to determine the KPIs of performance of built environments at the city level in terms of the combinations of level-specific and layer/concept specific KPIs in both expert and user point of views and integrate the findings with SIMURG_INTEGRATED, the final output of the master project. This paper aims to analyse and determine the KPIs at “Cities Level” for the smart concept that is referred to as “Layers” in the master project. Also, the other aim of the paper is to review Models of smart city frameworks/assessment tools/KPIs on urban development and sustainability owing to the literature review.

 

2. Materials and Methods

The conceptual framework of this research is based upon an analysis of KPIs for the smart city concept. Meta-analysis is used to make a classification of the literature in the study. It also purposes to allow for a better understanding of the smartness of an urban framework acquired with the augmented use of sustainable thinking, particularly regarding urban studies. Hence, at first, this research demonstrates the descriptions of concepts and hypothetical basics of smart cities. Literature review link to the papers and researches is submitted, with the keywords “smart cities” or "smart city” and its integration with terms regarding urban planning and city assessment/framework/performance indicator/KPI. The literature review on the background of the sustainability approach indicated that research referring in related to the urban framework is based on the headings of “smart cities" or "digital cities". The research was carried out through a search of libraries and scientific databases, particularly Taylor & Francis Online, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and the most respected urban journals, Cities, Journal of Urban Technology, Sustainable Cities and Society for the period of 2017-2020 to gather information and systematically review the hypothetical literature. As a result, fifty relevant papers were selected from these journals to analyse, determine, and categorize the concept of smart cities and their KPIs. The writers, subjects and methodologies of the reviewed fifty papers are presented in the Table 1 and 2. The purpose is to allow for better practical and accessible tools/performance-based assessment that provides this concept in all levels of decision-making in the future.


 

Table 1. Papers associated with KPIs of Smart City that have been issued in Urban Literature during 2017-2020.

Writers

Year

Journal

Subject

Research Methodology

Lam & Yang

2020

Cities

PPP for SC projects

Multi-attribute utility analysis

Wataya & Shaw

2019

Cities

Measuring soft assets in SCs development

Co-value creation evaluation

Molinillo et al.

2019

Cities

Measurement of SC communication via SM

Digital content analysis

Montalto et al.

2019

Cities

Measurement of the cultural vitality of ECs

An empirical approach

Huovila et al.

2019

Cities

Standardized indicators for sustainable SCs

Comparative analysis

Lam & Ma

2019

Cities

Identifying potential pitfalls in SCs development

An exploratory study

Heaton & Parlikad

2019

Cities

Infrastructure assets in SC framework

A conceptual framework

Shmelev & Shmeleva

2019

Cities

Multidimensional sustainability assessment for SC

Performance benchmarking

Yigitcanlar et al.

2018

Cities

Multidimensional sustainability assessment for SC

A systematic literature review

Ruhlandt

2018

Cities

Governance of SCs

A systematic literature review

Anthopoulos

2017

Cities

Performance analysis of international SC cases

A multi-methods approach

Navarro et al.

2017

Cities

ICT use and capability on SCs

Component analysis

Ahvenniemi

2017

Cities

Assessment framework for sustainable SCs

Performance benchmarking

Gessa & Sancha

2020

Journal of Urban Technology

Assessment framework for environmental in SC

Multiple case study research

Kiuru & Inkinen

2019

Journal of Urban Technology

E-Capital and economic growth in urban areas

An empirical approach

Costa-Liberato et al.

2018

Journal of Urban Technology

Digital Technology in Smart Tourism

A case study research

Falco et.al.

2018

Journal of Urban Technology

“Infostructure” approach to urban mobility

A case study research

Yigitcanlar & Kamruzzaman

2019

Journal of Urban Technology

SCs and Mobility

Multiple regression analysis

Fernandez-Anez et al.

2018

Journal of Urban Technology

Assessment framework of SC projects

Multiple case study research

Deal et al.

2017

Journal of Urban Technology

Urban resilience and planning support systems

A systematic literature review

Wong et al.

2017

Journal of Urban Technology

Knowledge structures of City ISs

Multiple case study research

Pak et al.

2017

Journal of Urban Technology

Socio-Demographic inequality in CP

A descriptive analysis

Joss et al.

2017

Journal of Urban Technology

Smart Citizen

A discourse analysis

PPP: Public-Private Partnerships, SC: Smart City, SM: Social Media, ECs: European cities, Iss: Innovation Systems, CP: Civic participation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Papers associated with KPIs of Smart City that has been published in Urban Literature from 2017 to 2020 (continued).

Writers

Year

Journal

Subject

Research Methodology

Yang et al.

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Transportation

A coupled simulation method

Shapsough et al.

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Performance measurement

Tang et al.

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Transportation

Machine learning methods

Deveci et al.

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

Assessment framework of SC projects

Interval Agreement Method

Sáez et al.

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

Sustainbale City performance

Performance benchmarking

Sharifi

2020

Sustainable Cities and Society

SC assessment tools and indicator sets

Performance measurement

Yigitcanlar et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart and sustainable cities

A systematic literature review

Karji et. al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Assessment of Social Sustainability Indicators

A case study research

Ghofrani et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart building

Neural Networks approach

Akande et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Sustainbale City performance

Component analysis

Horgan & Dimitrijević

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Citizen

A case study research

Nitoslawski et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Environment

A literature review

Walnum et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Multi-attribute decisionmaking

Mattoni et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Performance measurement

Zhu et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Machine learning methods

Michalec et al.

2019

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Environment

A discourse analysis

Zhang et al.

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Performance Evaluation for Smart Transportation

TOPSIS, A case study

Manupati et al.

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Urban renewal under SCs mission

Multi-criteria decision making

Ahmad & Chan

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Machine learning methods

Silva et al.

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Sustainable SCs

A literature review

Alkhalidi et al.

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Environment

The energy evaluation method

Aghamolaei et al.

2018

Sustainable Cities and Society

Performance Evaluation for Smart Energy

The energy evaluation method

Dall’O’ et al.

2017

Sustainable Cities and Society

SC assessment tools and indicator sets

Performance measurement

Bibri & Krogstie

2017

Sustainable Cities and Society

Sustainable SC assessment tools/indicator sets

A systematic literature review

Hukkalainen et. Al.

2017

Sustainable Cities and Society

Smart Energy

Holistic energy analysis

Poggi et al.

2017

Sustainable Cities and Society

Performance Evaluation for Smart Energy

A case study research

Massana et al.

2017

Sustainable Cities and Society

Performance Evaluation for Smart Energy

A case study research

PPP: Public-Private Partnerships, SC: Smart City, SM: Social Media, ECs: European cities, Iss: Innovation Systems, CP: Civic participation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


3. Results: Meta-Analysis for KPI’s of Layer-Based Approach in Sustainability Assessment

This section elaborates on the reviewed fifty papers in the literature and seven key themes and forty-four sub-themes/dimensions which are referred to in the last studies by Sharifi (2019, 2020) for the smart city assessment. The “typology of smart city evaluation tools and indicator sets” of Sharifi (2019, 2020) is used as a base for the meta-analysis table. Specific KPIs determined for each paper were marked in the meta-analysis table according to relevant themes or sub-themes/dimensions which were conducted topics in the papers. The findings of the meta-analysis are indicated in Tables 3, 4, and 5 that show the ratings of themes and sub-themes/dimensions related KPIs of a smart city in urban literature. The rating of seven themes for related KPIs of the smart city in the literature (Table 6), the major result of this research is that; environment, economy, governance-institutional, and data management is found to be the most important themes in urban and regional planning. Besides, the themes which are people, living and mobility (transport & ICT) need to become as important as the other themes.


 

Table 3. Themes and Sub-themes of the reviewed papers on Urban Literature.

Sharifi (2019) Assessment Tools & KPIs for Smart Cities

Relevant Studies for KPIs in Literature (2017-2020)

Lam & Yang (2020)

Wataya & Shaw (2019)

Molinillo et al. (2019)

Montalto et al. (2019)

Huovila et al. (2019)

Lam & Ma (2019)

Heaton & Parlikad (2019)

Shmelev & Shmeleva (2019)

Yigitcanlar et al. (2018)

Ruhlandt (2018)

Anthopoulos (2017)

Navarro et al. (2017)

Ahvenniemi (2017)

Gessa & Sancha (2020)

Kiuru & Inkinen (2019)

Costa-Liberato et al. (2018)

Falco et.al. (2018)

Theme

Dimension

Economy

Innovation/innovation culture

 

 

 

 

 

Knowledge economy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entrepreneurship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tourism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local & Global Interconnectedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productivity and efficiency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flexibility of the labor market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impacts

 

 

 

 

 

 

People

Education/ lifelong learning

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level of qualification/ ICT skills

 

 

 

 

Cosmopolitanism/ open mindedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Governance-institutional

Visioning and leadership

 

 

 

 

Legal and regulatory frameworks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Participation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transparency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public and social services

 

Efficient & integrated urban management

 

 

 

 

 

Environment

Environmental monitoring & management

 

 

 

 

 

 

General infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Built environment/planning and design

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Materials

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waste (solid waste, waste water, sewage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Environmental quality/pollution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living

Social cohesion/inclusion

 

 

 

 

 

Equity and justice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cultural development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Housing/livelihood quality

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Safety and security

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convenience and satisfaction/ well-being

 

 

 

 

 

Mobility (Transport & ICT)

Transport infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transportation management

 

 

 

 

 

ICT infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ICT management

 

 

 

 

 

 

ICT accessibility

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data management

Data openness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensing and collecting

 

 

 

 

 

Judging (analytics)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reacting

 

 

 

 

 

Learning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4. Themes and Sub-themes of the reviewed papers in Urban Literature (continued).

Sharifi (2019) Assessment Tools & KPIs for Smart Cities

Relevant Studies for KPIs in Literature (2017-2020)

Yigitcanlar & Kamruzzaman (2019)

Fernandez-Anez et al. (2018)

Deal et al. (2017)

Wong et al. (2017)

Pak et al. (2017)

Joss et al. (2017)

Yang et al. (2020)

Shapsough et al. (2020)

Tang et al. (2020)

Deveci et al. (2020)

Sáez et al. (2020)

Sharifi (2020)

Yigitcanlar et al. (2019)

Karji et. al. (2019)

Ghofrani et al. (2019)

Akande et al. (2019)

Horgan & Dimitrijević (2019)

Theme

Dimension

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economy

Innovation/innovation culture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knowledge economy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entrepreneurship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tourism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local & Global Interconnectedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productivity and efficiency

 

 

 

Flexibility of the labor market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impacts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People

Education/ lifelong learning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level of qualification/ ICT skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cosmopolitanism/ open mindedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Governance-institutional

Visioning and leadership

 

 

 

 

 

Legal and regulatory frameworks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Participation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transparency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public and social services

 

 

 

Efficient & integrated urban management

 

Environment

Environmental monitoring & management

 

 

 

General infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Built environment/planning and design

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Materials

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waste (solid waste, waste water, sewage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Environmental quality/pollution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living

Social cohesion/inclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity and justice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cultural development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Housing/livelihood quality

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Safety and security

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convenience and satisfaction/ well-being

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mobility (Transport & ICT)

Transport infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transportation management

 

 

 

ICT infrastructure

 

 

 

 

ICT management

 

 

 

ICT accessibility

 

 

 

Data management

Data openness

 

 

 

 

 

Sensing and collecting

 

Judging (analytics)

 

 

 

 

Reacting

 

Learning

 

 

 

 

 

Table 5. Themes and Sub-themes of the reviewed papers in Urban Literature (continued).

Sharifi (2019) Assessment Tools & KPIs for Smart Cities

Relevant Studies for KPIs in Literature (2017-2020)

Nitoslawski et al. (2019)

Walnum et al. (2019)

Mattoni et al. (2019)

Zhu et al. (2019)

Michalec et al. (2019)

Zhang et al. (2018)

Manupati et al. (2018)

Ahmad & Chan (2018)

Silva et al. (2018)

Alkhalidi et al. (2018)

Aghamolaei et al. (2018)

Dall’O’ et al. (2017)

Bibri & Krogstie (2017)

Hukkalainen et. Al. (2017)

Poggi et al. (2017)

Massana et al. (2017)

Total for dimensions

Total for themes

Theme

Dimension

Economy

Innovation/innovation culture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

219

Knowledge economy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

Entrepreneurship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

Tourism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

Employment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

Local & Global Interconnectedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

Productivity and efficiency

40

Flexibility of the labor market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

Impacts

 

 

 

32

People

Education/ lifelong learning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

68

Level of qualification/ ICT skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

Cosmopolitanism/ open mindedness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

Governance-institutional

Visioning and leadership

 

 

 

 

 

36

184

Legal and regulatory frameworks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

Participation

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

Transparency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

Public and social services

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

Efficient & integrated urban management

44

Environment

Environmental monitoring & management

41

264

General infrastructure

 

34

Built environment/planning and design

 

32

Materials

 

31

Energy resources

 

32

Water resources

 

31

Waste (solid waste, waste water, sewage)

 

31

Environmental quality/pollution

 

32

Living

Social cohesion/inclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

148

Equity and justice