<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Alanya Hamdullah Emin Pasa Universitesi</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCUA123</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Alanya Hamdullah Emin Pasa Universitesi</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">2475-6156</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2475-6164</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>Alanya Hamdullah Emin Pasa Universitesi</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n2-8</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>housing quality/ socio-economic characteristics/ residential neighbourhood/ sustainable housing delivery system/ quality of life in Nigerian.</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Correlation between Socio-Economic Characteristics and Housing Quality of Residential Neighbourhoods in Akure, Southwest Nigeria</article-title><subtitle>Housing Quality of Residential Neighbourhoods in Akure</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Olayiwola</surname>
		<given-names>Adewale Mukhtar </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Ajala</surname>
		<given-names>Olayinka Akinsumbo</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria</aff>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>08</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2022 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></license>
      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>Correlation between Socio-Economic Characteristics and Housing Quality of Residential Neighbourhoods in Akure, Southwest Nigeria</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			There is a general paucity of explanations for the emerging social and spatial changes in the pattern and socio-economic traits of urban residential housing units in Nigeria. Hence, this study examined the spatial pattern of residential neighbourhoods; assessed the quality of residential housing units; and evaluated the correlation between the socio-economic position of respondents and housing quality in Akure, Nigeria. Data were derived from the household questionnaire, remotely sensed data (Landsat 8 OLI/TIR, 2021), a Google Earth map, a Street Map of Akure Township, and personal observations. The study adopted a step-wise sampling technique to select 383 samples from 139,069 heads of households in Akure in 2021. Data were analysed using percentage distribution, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, and t-test. Results indicated varying housing qualities across three residential zones in Akure, Nigeria; houses in the low-density residential areas were of better quality than the other residential zones. The quality of houses occupied was influenced by the type of occupation, level of education and average annual income of residents. The study concluded that inadequate housing facilities are fundamental to the observed deteriorating housing qualities in the study area. Therefore, the study suggested improvement of the existing infrastructures and the provision of new ones in the study area. The main contribution of this study is to proffer solutions for a sustainable housing delivery system to facilitate a better quality of life in Nigerian urban centres.
		</p>
		</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body><sec>
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
				<p >Housing is consumed with some other items which appear to have no relationship with the land and its uses; one tends to be independent of another. The importance of providing adequate and quality housing in any country cannot be overstressed (Jiboye, 2010;Zainaletal., 2012;Adeleyeet al., 2014;Haqueet al., 2020). However, the re-current quality of housing requirements and the interminable craving for good housing appears to confirm the impression that there may be to cope satisfactorily with housing requirements (Hsu &amp; Guo, 2006;Owoeye &amp; Ogundiran, 2014;Page &amp; Gordon, 2017;Jochemet al., 2018). Thus, to satisfactorily appraise the quality and evaluate the characteristics of a house, it is important to assess the sociocultural heterogeneity and economic status of the individual property owner.</p><p >For this study, housing is regarded as dwelling units occupied by households. From this perspective, three types of housing can be recognised in urban centres: self-built housing development, private developer-led housing and public housing development. Whereas self-built housing is a single-family property, the other two types are owned by corporate organisations, which could be private or government. Self-built housing units are the most predominant type of housing units in developing countries (Gough &amp; Yankson, 2000;Cokeret al., 2008;Brkanic, 2017). However, they vary greatly both in characteristics and qualities.</p><p >Housing quality can be described as the standard of the residential environment that provides residents with sustainable accessibility, healthy, safe and beautiful accommodation. Housing quality embraces many factors such as the physical condition of the building and other facilities and services that make living in a particular area conducive. Fakunleet al. (2018) corroborated by Wimalasenaet al. (2022) submitted that the quality of housing within any neighbourhood should be such that satisfies minimum health and good living standards. Such houses are also required to be affordable to all categories of households. Studies have found that there exists a direct relationship between housing quality and quality of life (Zhonghua&amp; Xuejun, 2015;Fakunleet al., 2018). Therefore, good housing quality is a basic requirement to guarantee stable communities and social inclusion (Konadu-Agyemang, 2001;Wimalasenaet al., 2022).</p><p >Housing is regarded as one of the major factors determining the form of cities. Hence, a major concern in spatial analysis is the geographical distribution and pattern of housing within cities. Residential housing pattern has been the subject of considerable research for many years. The spatial arrangement of housing units in urban environments has been explained in some theoretical frameworks (Burgess, 1925;Hoyt, 1939;Harris &amp; Ullman, 1945). Burgess (1925) developed the concentric zone model as the first theory to describe the internal structure of a city. The central thesis embedded in Burgess’s model is that urban residence conforms to a zonal pattern. Hoyt (1939) proposed the sector theory wherein he considereddirectionand distance to explain the outward extension of the residential areas along district radii with new growths on the outer arc of the sector. Harris &amp; Ullmann (1945) provided an innovative description that analyses the spatial structure of urban areas in the multiple-nuclei theory.</p><p >Many studies have been carried out on urban housing in both the developed and developing worlds. For instance, in recent times there has been an extraordinary revival of interest in the spatial preferences of households in choosing a residential location, especially in the urban area. In the more advanced countries of America, the United Kingdom and the eastern part of the world, several studies have examined the changes in the pattern of residential houses (Kearney, 2006;Kurniati &amp; Erlambang, 2015;Gnatiuk &amp; Kryvets, 2018;Premier, 2021). Also, studies have been conducted to unravel the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood housing quality(Myung-Jin, 2013;Haqueet al., 2020). Furthermore, some studies have been conducted to examine the factors influencing housing quality (Sweiset al., 2014;Rajaei &amp; Mansourian, 2017;Renet al., 2019). Besides, there are quite ample studies on liveability in residential neighbourhoods (Streimikiene, 2015;Zhonghua &amp;Xuejun, 2015;Satu &amp; Chiu, 2019).</p><p >In the developing world, particularly, Nigeria, several studies have been carried out on urban housing (Gough, 2000;Arkuet al., 2011;Filali, 2012;Baer, 2014;Adedire &amp; Adegbile, 2017;Ezeanah, 2020). In recent times, there is a revitalisation of interest in the spatial preferences of households in choosing residential locations within an urban environment (Fakunleet al., 2018). Moreover, studies have shown that residential neighbourhoods exist in different patterns (Fasakin, 2018).Furthermore, studies have revealed thatthere are gross inequalities in the quality of residential housing units (Ogu, 2002;Morenikejiet al., 2017;Thomas&amp; Hassan, 2018;Ezeanah, 2020). There are many studies on the poor environmental and health condition of slum areas and squatter settlements (Fadairo &amp; Ganiyu, 2010;Omole, 2010;Babalolaet al., 2016). In addition, studies have been conducted onfactors influencing housing quality(Yoadeet al., 2015;Yoadeet al., 2018). Also,several efforts have been made at documenting the characteristics and conditions of residential housing units in Nigerian urban centres (Salami, 2016). There are scanty studies on urban housing in Akure, where the present study was conducted. Omole (2010) assessed housing conditions and socio-economic lifestyles of slum dwellers in Akure, Nigeria. In another study, Fasakinet al. (2018) focused on the impacts of land pricing on the pattern of residential density in Akure.</p><p >From the foregoing,it is obvious that while most of these studies only provided general views on housing, some others focused on just one particular aspect of urban housing.In other words, none of theexisting studies on Akurehas combined themes of urban housing quality and characteristics with the pattern of the residential neighbourhood.Yet, this is a major policy issue that should not be underemphasised.Therefore,this study seeks to fill the gap in the emerging social-spatial transformations by advancing knowledge on the physical structure and socio-economic characteristics of urbanresidentialhousing units in developing countriesusing Akure, Ondo State, Nigeriaas a case study.Thus, thisstudyassessedthe relationship between housing quality and the socio-economic characteristicsof residents in the study area.Also,the studyexaminedenvironmental issues associated with people living inthe studyarea.Furthermore,the studyevaluatedthe resulting patternof the residential neighbourhoodinthe study area. These were with the view of offering explanations for sustainable housing delivery systems to improve living conditions in Nigerian urban centres.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>2.The Study Area</title>
				<p >The study was carried out in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. It lies between latitudes 7°07'N and 7°37'N and longitudes 5°06'E and 5°38'E (Figure 1). Akure, with a land area of approximately 991km², is the capital city of Ondo State with two Local Government Areas (LGA); Akure South and Akure North LGAs (Ibitoyeet al., 2017). The aboriginal people are of the Yoruba tribe, though there are other tribes such as Igbira, Igbo, Edo and Hausa, among others. Major economic activities include farming, trading, tourism, and civil service. Also, the inhabitants of Akure engage in scale indigenous industrial works such as cloth weaving,gaariproduction, block and bakery activities (Eades, 1980;Daniel, 2015;Ondo State Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, OSMANR, 2015;Ibitoyeet al., 2017).</p><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5655/html.005.png"/></fig><p >Figure 1.The Study Area.</p><p >Sources: Landsat 8 OLI/TIR, 2021;Google Earth map, 2021</p><p >Town Planning Division of Akure South Local Government Area.</p><p >According to the National Population Commission of Nigeria (NPC), the population of Akure in the last national headcount conducted in 2006 was 353,211 (NPC, 2006). Based on this census result, the population of the study area for the current year of study, 2021, was estimated using an official annual growth rate of 3.2% for urban centres in Nigeria (Nigeria Bureau of Statistics, NBS, 2021). However, because the population is compounded annually, the addition of annual growth rate (r) and 1 (a constant that denotes the inclusion of the current year in the calculation) was raised to a power of the number of years for which the population was projected (t) and multiplied by the population of the base year (Po). The formula is given as follows (Equation 1):</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5656/html.006.png"/></fig>(Eq. 1)</p><p >Due to its latitudinal location, Akure experiences a tropical humid climate with two distinct seasons; wet and dry seasons. The wet season starts in April and ends in October, spanning over seven months. The total annual rainfall ranges between 1300mm and 1650mm (Asiwaju-Belloet al,2013; OSMANR, 2015). Temperature is generally high during the day, especially in March and April. The annual mean temperature is 29°C. While evaporation is usually low from June to September (3.3mm to 4.0mm per day), relative humidity ranges between 5% and 90%, between the seasons (Asiwaju-Belloet al,2013). The vegetation of Akure is rain forest consisting of valuable trees used for timber products such as Mahogany,Obeche, Iroko,andAfara. However, the area is fast becoming a derived forest zone due to persistent clearance of the vegetation.</p><p >The study area contains lowlands and rugged hills (between 315m and 402m above the mean sea level). While the northeastern part consists of basement complex rocks, the southern section comprises sand ridges, lagoons, swamps, and creeks. The soils are mostly tropical ferruginous with varied textures and gravel content (Ibitoyeet al., 2017).</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
				<p >3.1. Data Sources</p><p >Data for the study were extracted from Landsat 8 OLI/TIR,Google Earth map, Street Map of Akure, and household questionnaire (Table 1). Also, detailed personal observations were carried outusing handheld GPS for recording the location attributes of major landmarks in the study area.</p><p >Table1.Characteristics and Sources of Data.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Data</td><td>Year</td><td>Resolution</td><td>Path/Row</td><td>Source</td></tr><tr><td>Questionnaire</td><td>2021</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>Field Survey</td></tr><tr><td>Township Map of Akure</td><td>2016</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>Town Planning, Akure South LGA</td></tr><tr><td>Shapefiles of:NigeriaOndo StateAkure</td><td>202120212021</td><td>N/AN/AN/A</td><td>N/AN/AN/A</td><td>AFRIGIST, O.A.U. Ile-IfeAFRIGIST, O.A.U. Ile-IfeAFRIGIST, O.A.U. Ile-Ife</td></tr><tr><td>Landsat 8 OLI/TIR</td><td>March 6, 2021</td><td>28.5m</td><td>190/055</td><td>http;//glcf.umiacs.umd.edu</td></tr><tr><td>GoogleEarth map, Akure</td><td>Accessed:September 10, 2021</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Population data</td><td>2006</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>NPC, Nigeria</td></tr><tr><td>GPS Coordinate</td><td>2021</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>Ground Truthing</td></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Notes:</p><p >N/A: Not Applicable</p><p >AFRIGIST: African Regional Institute for Geospatial Information Science and Technology</p><p >O.A.U.: Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife</p><p >The sample frame for this study includes all heads of households in the study area. In 2006 there were 89,263 households in Akure (NPC, 2006). However, there has not been another national headcount in Nigeria since 2006, therefore, the study used an estimated number of households based onthe officialannual growth rate of 3% for urban centres in Nigeria (FBS, 2021).The compound interest formula was used to calculate the number of households for the current year of study, 2021,as contained inEquation 2.</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5657/html.007.png"/></fig> (Eq. 2)</p><p >Where:</p><p >A= number of households for the current year, 2021.</p><p >P=number of households in the last headcount, 2006 (=89,263).</p><p >r= annual rate of increase (FBS, 2021) = 3% (0.03).</p><p >n= number of times the increase is compounded per year (= 1).</p><p >t= number of years between the last headcount and the current year (=15 years)</p><p >Applying theformula, the number of households in Akure in 2021 was139,069.The appropriate sample for this study was determined using an online calculator (Creative Research Systems - Sample Size Calculator). Thus,383out of the total139,069 households in Akure in 2021were selectedfor this study. A stratified sampling technique was adopted in the selection of residential housing units for the study. However, noting that there were variations in the quantity and concentration of buildings, the study area was categorised into three strata:</p>High-Density Residential Zone (HRZ)Medium-Density Residential Zone (MRZ)Low-Density Residential Zone (LRZ)<p >Furthermore, using theonline calculatorwith particular consideration for the differences in building clusters, the383samples were distributed among the three residential zones (Table 2).</p><p >Table 2.Distribution of Samples in the Study Area.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>S/N</td><td>Zone</td><td>Number of Households</td><td>Sample Size</td></tr><tr><td>1.</td><td>High (HRZ)</td><td>50,417</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><td>2.</td><td>Medium (MRZ)</td><td>45,021</td><td>119</td></tr><tr><td>3.</td><td>Low (LRZ)</td><td>39,581</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>135, 019</td><td>383</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >3.2. Data Analysis</p><p >The study adopted a combined process of visual image interpretation and digital image processing to identify similar clusters of pixels that characterise the land use class of interest. Thus, following the supervised image classification procedure by adopting the maximum likelihood algorithm, the area was classified into two broad land uses/covers:</p>Built-up area: all areas containing building structures.Non-built-up area: this included vegetation, water body, and bare surfaces.<p >The spatial accuracy assessment utilised included producer accuracy (PA), user’s accuracy (OA), and overall accuracy (OA) indices (Table 3). Also, KAPPA analysis was performed to ascertain the level of accuracy of image classification. Moreover, z statistics were calculated to validate the reliability of the imagery accuracy assessment (Sinha, 2016).</p><p >Table 3.Distribution of ValidationPoints (byLULC).</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>S/N</td><td>LULC Class</td><td>No. of Points</td></tr><tr><td>Topographical Map</td><td>GoogleEarth Map</td><td>Ground Points</td></tr><tr><td>Built-up</td><td>28</td><td>46</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>Non-built-up</td><td>35</td><td>55</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>63</td><td>101</td><td>115</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Tovividly describe the pattern of the residential neighbourhood in the study area, features of interest such as major roads and the built-up area were digitised in Google Earth and saved askmlfiles for further processing in ArcGIS. The converted layers were then overlaid on a Google Earth map of Akure where on-screen digitising was employed to extract the built-up area and streets. Using the Google Earth map complemented with the ground-truthing, the densities of the buildings were digitised to classify the study area into three residential zones: High-density, Medium-density, and Low-density residential zones.</p><p >The first step in the analysis of data obtained through the questionnaire involved the identification of parameters and variables for assessment. Two parameters were involved in the analysis;the socio-economic status of respondents and the quality of buildings (Table 4).</p><p >Table 4.Parameters and Variables for Assessment.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>S/N</td><td>Parameters</td><td>Variables</td><td>Tag</td></tr><tr><td>1.</td><td>Socio-economic (n = 6)</td><td>Age</td><td>x1</td></tr><tr><td>Gender</td><td>x2</td></tr><tr><td>Marital Status</td><td>x3</td></tr><tr><td>Level of Education</td><td>x4</td></tr><tr><td>Occupation</td><td>x5</td></tr><tr><td>Average Income</td><td>x6</td></tr><tr><td>2.</td><td>Housing Quality (n = 11)</td><td>House Type</td><td>y1</td></tr><tr><td>Floor</td><td>y2</td></tr><tr><td>Wall</td><td>y3</td></tr><tr><td>Painting</td><td>y4</td></tr><tr><td>Roof</td><td>y5</td></tr><tr><td>Ceiling</td><td>y6</td></tr><tr><td>Water</td><td>y7</td></tr><tr><td>Toilet</td><td>y8</td></tr><tr><td>Waste</td><td>y9</td></tr><tr><td>Electricity</td><td>y10</td></tr><tr><td>Fence</td><td>y11</td></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Data obtained through the questionnairewere analysed usingpercentages and mean which were used to assess the socio-economic characteristics of heads of households in Akure, and to evaluate the characteristics and quality of housing units in Akure. The relationship between socioeconomic status and the quality of buildings occupied by respondents in the study area was determined using Pearson Correlation Coefficient (Equation 3). The purpose of the Pearson correlation coefficient (denoted by r and also known as Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient) is to determine the relationship between two quantitative variables and the degree to which the two variables coincide with each another. In this study, the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to measure the linear relationship between socioeconomic status and the quality of buildings in the study area.</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5658/html.008.png"/></fig> (Eq. 3)</p><p >Where:</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5659/html.009.png"/></fig>= socio-economic characteristics of respondents (<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5660/html.010.png"/></fig>,Table 4)</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5643/html.011.png"/></fig>= the quality of the building (<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5644/html.012.png"/></fig>,Table 4)</p><p >In Pearson Correlation Coefficient, the correlation is strong (or high) if r is ±0.50 ≤ ± 1; moderate degree if r r is ±0.30 ≤ ± 0.49, and low (or small) correlation when the value lies below +0.29.</p><p >Housing quality was derived by finding the average of the mean values of<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5644/html.012.png"/></fig>(Equation 4).</p><p >y = ∑ (<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5645/html.013.png"/></fig>1+<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5645/html.013.png"/></fig>2+ …….<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5645/html.013.png"/></fig>11)/n(Eq. 4)</p><p >Therefore, the variance of housing quality was derived by finding the average of the variance values of<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5644/html.012.png"/></fig>(Equation 5).</p><p >y = ∑ (<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5646/html.014.png"/></fig>1+<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5646/html.014.png"/></fig>2+ …….<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5646/html.014.png"/></fig>11)/n(Eq. 5)</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
				<p >4.1.Image Analysis</p><p >This section contains the results of image analysis such as classification into land use/cover classes, area statistics calculation, accuracy assessment, and extraction of the built-up class.</p><p >4.1.1.General landcover of the study area</p><p >For this analysis, the land use and land cover (LULC) in the study area were classified into two broad classes; built-up and non-built-up areas (Table 5). While the non-built-up area covered just about a quarter of the total land area (26.9%), the built-up covered 73.1% (Table 5).</p><p >Table 5.Imagery classification.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Class Name</td><td>Area covered (km²)</td><td>% (of Total Land area)</td></tr><tr><td>Built-up</td><td>724.42</td><td>73.1</td></tr><tr><td>Non-built up</td><td>266.58</td><td>26.9</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>991</td><td>100</td></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Sources:Landsat OLI/TIRS 2021 (Path 190 Row 55).</p><p >Figure2shows the spatial occurrence and area extent of the two classified land covers in Akurein 2021. The built-up was found in almost every part of the study area. Although the built-up area has spread to almost every part of Akure, there were still patches of non-built-up portions in the city. At this stage, Akure can be described as a fully developed urban centre in 2021.</p><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5647/html.015.png"/></fig><p >Figure 2.General landcover ofAkure, 2021.</p><p >4.1.2. Results ofaccuracy assessment</p><p >Results of the image classification accuracy assessment indicate that the producer’s accuracy (PA) = 97.66,the user's accuracy (UA) = 100.00, and the overall accuracy (OA) was 99.74% (Table 6). Kappa analysis was 0.9237 and z statistic yielded 44.08. These values indicate that there were significant agreements between the validation points and the extracted classes (Zanonet al., 2019).</p><p >Table 6.Imagery classification and accuracy assessment.</p><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5648/html.016.png"/></fig><p >Sources:Landsat OLI/TIRS 2021 (Path 190 Row 55)</p><p >Note:PA= producer’s accuracy, UA= user’s accuracy, OA = overall accuracy</p><p >4.2. TheBuilt-up Areaof Akure</p><p >Thebuilt-up area comprises residential quarters, business premises, and public utility buildings. Residential quarters provide accommodation for the human being; they are where man lives. Business premises are areas of commerce and economic activities. The business premises also include areas of industrial activities, whether local (indigenous) or modern. Public utility buildings are such areas that provide a common palace for community/township activities. Among such public buildings are the king’s palace, town hall, places of worship (churches and mosques), all-day open market system, police station as well as educational and health institutions. Figure3shows the spatial occurrence and the extent of the built-up area of Akure in 2021. The built-up area occupied an area of 724.42 km² (73.11%) spread to every part of the study area.</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5649/html.017.png"/></fig></p><p >Figure3.The Built-up Area of Akure, 2021.</p><p >Source: Landsat 8 OLI/TIR, 2021</p><p >4.2.1.Pattern of theResidential Neighbourhood</p><p >Theresidential neighbourhoodincludes all areas occupied by residential buildings. These buildings werefound in every part of the study area; however, the heaviest density was in the central part of the study area where the development impulses were more concentrated. Public utility buildings like the palace, town hall, many places of worship (churches and mosques), all-day open market system and oldest buildings in the city were found to form circular rings around Arakale, Igisan, Oba-Adesida Road, and CMS areas of the settlement (Figure 4). Asides from this concentration, sporadic developments dotted some areas in the northern and eastern parts of the study area. The pattern exhibited by the built-up area in the central part was found to be following the Concentric Zonation pattern identified by Burgess in 1925 (Figure 4).</p><p >Housing developments were found to follow the axial corridors created by the roads. This is most noticeable along Akure – Benin, Akure – Ado Ekiti, Akure – Ondo, and Akure – Ilesa roads (Figure 4). Thus, this encouraged the development of a linear pattern of growth similar to Hoyt’s sectorial pattern (Hoyt, 1939).</p><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="https://ijcua.com/index.php/ijcua/article/download/316/487/5650/html.018.png"/></fig><p >Figure 4.Pattern ofResidential Neighbourhood in Akure.</p><p >4.3. Socio-Economic Characteristics of Respondents</p><p >The average monthly income of respondents was based on a threshold of₦30,000 ($66.67) which was the minimum labour wage in the country at the time of this study. Respondents in the area were well-educated with only 13.8% without any formal education. Also, the majority of the respondents were gainfully employed; only 11.5% were either students or unemployed. However, at the zonal level of analysis, there were some internal disparities in the socio-economic characteristics of respondents. For instance, whereas primary and secondary education were mostly favoured in the HRZ, secondary and tertiary education were more prominent in the other zones. Also, in the HRZ and MRZ, trading and craftmanship were the major human occupations, while civil service and trading were the most attractive occupations in the LRZ. Though, income distribution appears to be similar across the three zones; the point of departure was in the spread of middle-high income (₦200,001; $444.44 -₦500,000; $1,111.11); the majority of whom were found in the LRZ (Table 7).</p><p >Table 7.Socio-Economic Characteristics of Respondents.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Tag</td><td>Characteristics</td><td>Residential Zones</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>Medium</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>N</td><td>%</td><td>n</td><td>%</td><td>N</td><td>%</td><td>N</td><td>%</td></tr><tr><td>X1</td><td>Age18 - 40 years41 – 65 yearsAbove 65Total</td><td>318678195</td><td>15.944.140.0100</td><td>265439119</td><td>21.845.432.8100</td><td>9233769</td><td>13.133.353.6100</td><td>66163154383</td><td>17.242.640.2100</td></tr><tr><td>X2</td><td>GenderMaleFemaleTotal</td><td>12273195</td><td>62.637.4100</td><td>7841119</td><td>65.534.5100</td><td>511869</td><td>73.926.1100</td><td>251132383</td><td>65.534.5100</td></tr><tr><td>X3</td><td>Marital StatusMarriedSingleDivorcedWidowedTotal</td><td>88362447195</td><td>45.118.512.324.1100</td><td>7620815119</td><td>63.916.86.712.6100</td><td>36274269</td><td>52.239.15.82.9100</td><td>200833664383</td><td>52.221.79.416.7100</td></tr><tr><td>X4</td><td>Level of EducationNo Formal EducationPrimary EducationSecondary EducationTertiary EducationTotal</td><td>32517438195</td><td>16.426.237.919.5100</td><td>13284236119</td><td>10.923.535.330.3100</td><td>84213669</td><td>11.65.830.452.2100</td><td>5383137110383</td><td>13.821.735.828.7100</td></tr><tr><td>X5</td><td>OccupationCivil ServiceSelf-employed/CraftsmanshipTradingOthersUnemployedTotal</td><td>1465722123195</td><td>7.233.336.910.811.8100</td><td>2139301613119</td><td>17.632.825.213.410.9100</td><td>3171211869</td><td>44.910.117.415.911.6100</td><td>661111144844383</td><td>17.229.029.812.511.5100</td></tr><tr><td>X6</td><td>Average Monthly Income&lt;₦30,000*(&lt; $66.67**)₦30,000 ($66.67) -₦100,000 ($222.22)₦100,001 ($222.22) -₦200,000 ($444.44)₦200,001 ($444.44) -₦500,000 ($1,111.11)&gt;₦500,000 (&gt; $1,111.11)Total</td><td>488234283195</td><td>24.642.117.414.41.5100</td><td>343122239119</td><td>28.626.018.519.37.6100</td><td>1082124669</td><td>14.511.630.434.88.7100</td><td>92121777519383</td><td>24.031.620.119.64.7100</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Source:Field Research, 2021</p><p >Notes:*The official minimum wage in Nigeria was₦30,000 (USD 66.67) per month.</p><p > **Conversion was based on a conversion rate of₦450 to $1 as of September 2021</p><p >4.4. Quality and Characteristics of Residential Houses</p><p >The most common types of residential housing units in the study area were of the traditional type (50.1%). Modern flat buildings and duplexes were more common in the low residential area. Materials used for flooring indicated that modern techniques were not yet fully adopted in the study area; concrete or cement flooring styles still predominates in Akure at an average of 50.9% with the highest proportion found in the high-density residential zone (66.2%). Modern and fashionable flooring styles were not fully adopted; while only 44.6% were tilled, just 3.4% used terrazzo materials (Table 8). However, standard roofing and ceiling materials were being gradually accepted in the area (asbestos ceiling, 50.1%; plastic P. O. P. 24.5%; carved P. O. P 22.5%).</p><p >Results indicated that 67.1% of the sampled houses were fully plastered. However, internal variations between the zones reveal that 75.9% in the high-density zone and 71.0% in the low-density zone were fully plastered. This contrasted the situation in the medium-density zone where only 50.4% were fully plastered; none of the buildings was with mud walls. (Table 8).</p><p >Table 8.Quality and Characteristics of Residential Buildings in Akure.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Tag</td><td>Materials Used for Construction</td><td>Residential Zones</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>Medium</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>n</td><td>%</td><td>n</td><td>%</td><td>n</td><td>%</td><td>N</td><td>%</td></tr><tr><td>Y1</td><td>House TypeTraditional compound (Bungalow)Traditional compound (Storey Building)Traditional compound (mixed)Bungalow (flat)Storey Building (Multi-flat)DuplexTotal</td><td>8443932216195</td><td>43.122.14.616.410.83.1100</td><td>16275411614119</td><td>13.422.74.234.513.411.8100</td><td>71501862369</td><td>10.121.70.026.18.733.3100</td><td>1078514914343383</td><td>27.922.23.723.811.211.2100</td></tr><tr><td>Y2</td><td>FlooringMud or EarthConcrete/CementTilesTerrazzo/GranolithicTotal</td><td>3129621195</td><td>1.566.231.80.5100</td><td>062516119</td><td>0.052.142.95.0100</td><td>1458669</td><td>1.45.884.18.7100</td><td>419517113383</td><td>1.050.944.63.4100</td></tr><tr><td>Y3</td><td>WallingMud onlyPlastered mudClay bricksConcrete blocksPlastered concrete blocksTotal</td><td>316721148195</td><td>1.58.23.610.875.9100</td><td>09163460119</td><td>0.07.613.428.650.4100</td><td>121254969</td><td>1.42.917.47.271.0100</td><td>4273560257383</td><td>1.07.09.115.767.1100</td></tr><tr><td>Y4</td><td>RoofingAsbestos sheets (Addex)Concrete DeckZincRoofing TilesTotal</td><td>1081752195</td><td>5.14.189.71.0100</td><td>213968119</td><td>1.710.980.76.7100</td><td>27253569</td><td>2.910.136.250.7100</td><td>142829645383</td><td>3.77.377.311.7100</td></tr><tr><td>Y5</td><td>Ceiling MaterialsAsbestosConcreteCarved P. O. P.Plastic P. O. P.Total</td><td>11081958195</td><td>56.44.19.729.7100</td><td>5933621119</td><td>49.62.530.317.6100</td><td>230311569</td><td>33.30.044.921.7100</td><td>192118694383</td><td>50.12.922.524.5100</td></tr><tr><td>Y6</td><td>PaintingEntire BuildingInside onlyOutside onlyNot paintedOthersTotal</td><td>763216422195</td><td>39.016.40.532.811.3100</td><td>52213412119</td><td>43.717.62.534.51.7100</td><td>421319469</td><td>60.918.81.413.05.8100</td><td>17066511428383</td><td>44.417.21.329.87.3100</td></tr><tr><td>Y7</td><td>Water Sources (main source)BoreholeWellRiver/streamPublic water serviceTotal</td><td>39103053195</td><td>20.052.80.027.2100</td><td>3764117119</td><td>31.153.80.814.3100</td><td>43191669</td><td>62.327.51.48.7100</td><td>119186276383</td><td>31.148.60.519.8100</td></tr><tr><td>Y8</td><td>Toilet facilityWater systemPitBushRiver/streamPublic toiletTotal</td><td>110290056195</td><td>56.414.90.00.028.7100</td><td>71310116119</td><td>59.726.00.00.813.4100</td><td>59441169</td><td>85.55.85.81.41.4100</td><td>240644273383</td><td>62.716.71.00.519.1100</td></tr><tr><td>Y9</td><td>Electricity (main source)PublicGeneratorSolar/inverterOthers (candles, lanterns, rechargeable lamps)Total</td><td>14153226195</td><td>7.278.511.33.1100</td><td>1269362119</td><td>10.158.030.31.7100</td><td>102829269</td><td>14.540.642.0100</td><td>362508710383</td><td>9.465.322.72.6100</td></tr><tr><td>Y9</td><td>Security fenceFullPartNoneTotal</td><td>6114120195</td><td>31.37.261.5100</td><td>682328119</td><td>57.119.323.5100</td><td>4913769</td><td>71.018.810.1100</td><td>17850155383</td><td>46.513.140.5100</td></tr><tr><td>Y10</td><td>Waste disposalContainers/bagsOpen dump siteGutterPublic dust binPrivate collectorBurningLandfillingStreamTotal</td><td>2733772311942195</td><td>13.816.93.636.915.99.72.11.0100</td><td>211215914570119</td><td>17.610.10.849.611.84.25.90.0100</td><td>812212772169</td><td>11.61.42.930.439.110.12.91.4100</td><td>5646101527231133383</td><td>14.612.02.639.718.88.13.40.8100</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Source: Field Research, 2021</p><p >4.5. Correlation between Socio-Economic Characteristics andHouse Quality</p><p >Results of coefficients of correlationbetween socio-economic characteristics of respondents and house quality at the level of the residential zone in Akure, Nigeriaindicated that there were high correlations between house quality and level of education (r = 0.99) in the high- and medium-density residential zones (Table 9). In the low-density residential zone, only occupation had a significant relationship with housing quality (r = 0.60). There were inverse correlations between housing quality and average monthly income (-0.454), and marital status (-0.689).</p><p >Table 9.Correlation between Socio-economic Characteristics and Housing Quality (by Zone).</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>House Quality</td><td>Age</td><td>Gender</td><td>Level of Education</td><td>Occupation</td><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>Marital Status</td></tr><tr><td>High-Density Residential Zone</td></tr><tr><td>Housing</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>0.613</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Gender</td><td>0.338</td><td>0.796</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Level of Education</td><td>0.993</td><td>0.871</td><td>0.678</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Occupation</td><td>0.428</td><td>0.813</td><td>0.769</td><td>0.813</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>0.978</td><td>0.886</td><td>0.750</td><td>0.919</td><td>0.797</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Marital Status</td><td>0.868</td><td>0.909</td><td>0.926</td><td>0.805</td><td>0.077</td><td>0.952</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Medium-Density Residential Zone</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Housing</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>0.736</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Gender</td><td>0.695</td><td>0.698</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Level of Education</td><td>0.900</td><td>0.901</td><td>0.767</td><td>1.000</td><td>0.334</td></tr><tr><td>Occupation</td><td>0.313</td><td>0.924</td><td>0.879</td><td>0.334</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>-0.454</td><td>0.906</td><td>0.805</td><td>-0.285</td><td>-0.904</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Marital Status</td><td>-0.689</td><td>0.898</td><td>0.967</td><td>-0.909</td><td>-0.573</td><td>0.374</td><td>1.000</td></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Low-Density Residential Zone</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>Housing</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>0.922</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Gender</td><td>0.426</td><td>0.817</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Level of Education</td><td>0.408</td><td>0.913</td><td>0.678</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Occupation</td><td>0.601</td><td>0.877</td><td>0.769</td><td>0.442</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>0.470</td><td>0.968</td><td>0.750</td><td>0.129</td><td>0.508</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Marital Status</td><td>0.366</td><td>0.997</td><td>0.914</td><td>0.997</td><td>-0.464</td><td>-0.154</td><td>1.000</td></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Source: Field Research, 2021</p><p >At the level of the entire city, results indicate that all the socio-economic characteristics considered have a high correlation with the quality of residential housing units occupied by the respondents. Level of education with a correlation coefficient of 0.588 has the weakest correlation with housing quality in the study area (Table 10).</p><p >Table 10.Aggregate Correlation of Housing Quality and Socio-Economic factors.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>House Quality</td><td>Age</td><td>Gender</td><td>Level of Education</td><td>Occupation</td><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>Marital Status</td></tr><tr><td>High-Density Residential Zone</td></tr><tr><td>Housing</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>0.613</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Gender</td><td>0.338</td><td>0.796</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Level of Education</td><td>0.993</td><td>0.871</td><td>0.678</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Occupation</td><td>0.428</td><td>0.813</td><td>0.769</td><td>0.813</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>AverageAnnual Income</td><td>0.978</td><td>0.886</td><td>0.750</td><td>0.919</td><td>0.797</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr><td>Marital Status</td><td>0.868</td><td>0.909</td><td>0.926</td><td>0.805</td><td>0.077</td><td>0.952</td><td>1.000</td></tr><tr></tr></table></table-wrap><p >Source: Field Research, 2021</p><p >4.6. Discussion</p><p >The socioeconomic variables considered in this study spread across all works of life. The high similarity of some of the socio-economic characteristics considered among the three residential zones in the study area indicates that the population in the study was of homogeneous characteristics. Results of the general land use/cover analysis through Landsat imageries show that more than half (55.1%) of the total land in the study area had been built up. Though there were sporadic developments in other parts, there was a remarkable expansion of the built-up area in the central part. This corroborates the findings of other studies that residential land accounts for the largest proportion of total urban land uses in many African cities (Cokeret al.,2008;Arkuet al., 2011;Ezeanah, 2020).</p><p >Like Ogu (2002), this study identified three residential zones in the study area based on building densities (high-density, medium-density, and high-density zones). The high-density zone is the core area of the city where the oldest buildings are found; this is where the settlement started. The zone lacks planning controls and there was a very little touch of modern technology in the housing standards. However, some of the buildings have been either renovated or reconstructed, particularly along the major roads. This zone houses the largest share of the business and economic activities in the city; therefore, the area was swarming with a large population, and of course the attendant noisy environment.</p><p >In the medium-density residential zone, there were traces of the introduction of new waves of development. The houses were of better quality than in the old core of the city. The majority of the inhabitants of this zone were average-income earners who were able to own a house or afford to pay the house rent. This zone contains more roads, most of which lead outwards from the city. Thus, in place of the concentric pattern formed in the high-density zone, foundations for the sectorial pattern were laid in the medium-density area. The low-density residential zone was a bit more orderly with sophisticated building materials than other zones. In agreement with Jiboye (2010), housing facilities in this zone were found to be better and more sufficient than in the other zones. Residential houses in this zone agree with the description ofsome earlier studies that housing is not just a shelter because it includes all the social services and utilities that make a neighbourhood a habitable setting (Kearney, 2006;Adeleyeet al., 2014;Brkanic, 2017).</p><p >The observed variations in the quality and characteristics across the different residential zones in Akure might not be unconnected with the educational levels and type of occupation of the inhabitants (seeTable 7). Considering the settlement at large, though mud walls and earth-surfaced floors are fast disappearings in the study area, the result indicates that the level of technology of building construction in the area was still at a rudimentary level.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>5.Conclusion</title>
				<p >This study has shed some light on the quality and condition of residential housing in Akure, especially in terms of adequacy of basic housing utilities as well as relationships between the socio-economic characteristics of residents and the quality of buildings occupied in Akure, Nigeria. Results of the study have revealed that there were differential relationships between house quality and the socio-economic characteristics of respondents across the three residential zones in Akure, Nigeria. For instance, there were high correlations between house quality and level of education in the high- and medium-density residential zones. In the low-density residential zone, only occupation had a noteworthy relationship with housing quality. However, there were inverse correlations between housing quality and an average monthly income as well as marital status in all the zones. Moreover, the study observed that inadequate housing facilities are fundamental to the observed deteriorating housing qualities in the study area. Therefore, the study recommends as follows.</p><p >First, for sustainable housing delivery in the study area, house owners should be educated on the relationship between essential housing facilities and the health of the inhabitants. This will encourage property owners to accept any byelaws that may be enacted to induce housing providers to provide certain basic services in their houses. Second, noting that poor housing quality is linked with low income, poverty alleviation programmes should be improved to reduce the unemployment rate in the country which will enhance the provision for basic household facilities and proper maintenance of buildings. Moreover, there is a need for a renewal programme through a renovation approach and the construction of more roads to open the devastated areas.</p><p >Although few concepts of housing quality were explored in this study, it makes some relevant contributions to the existing body of knowledge on housing research. It has shed some light on the opinions of residents on the quality and condition of housing in Akure, Nigeria. Also, the study has successfully employed Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System techniques to evaluate the pattern and quality of residential housing units which did previously not exist in the study area. In addition to this, the study has incorporated housing patterns and housing quality in just one research, which is very infrequent. Furthermore, the findings of the study, through the statistical analysis of the correlation between the socio-economic characteristics of respondents and house quality, have provided a set of specific factors inﬂuencing house quality and characteristics in the study area. Nonetheless, one major policy implication that can be drawn from the findings of this study is that adequate and effective measures to ensure residential land use development control should be introduced. Therefore, it is hoped that the findings of this study will provide a sufficient basis for policy attention on housing improvements in major urban centres in the country. The evaluated concepts can serve as a basis for further studies on housing quality assessment. Also, this study can be used as a foundation for the evaluation of other sets of valuable criteria for analysing the characteristics and quality of residential housing.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Funding</title>
				<p >This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Conflicts of interests</title>
				<p>The author declared that there was no conflict of interest relating to the conduct, outcome, and publication of this study.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Data availability statement</title>
				<p >Raw data were generated from remotely sensed data. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [A.M.] on request.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Ethics statements</title>
				<p >Studies involving animal subjects:No animal studies are presented in this manuscript.</p><p >Studies involving human subjects: No human studies are presented in this manuscript.</p><p >Inclusion of identifiable human data: No potentially identifiable human images or data is presented in this study.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>CRedit author statement</title>
				<p>Conceptualization: A.M., O.A. Data curation: A.M., O.A. Formal analysis: A.M., O.A. Funding acquisition: No funding Investigation: A.M., O.A. Methodology: A.M., O.A. Project administration: A.M.. Writing—original draft: A.M. Writing—review and editing: A.M., O.A.. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>References</title>
				<p >Adedire, F. M., &amp; Adegbile, M. B. O. (2017). Factors Influencing Housing Characteristics in Lagos Peripheral Settlements: Case of Ikorodu,Architecture Research,7(5), 191-200.https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20170705.01</p><p >Adeleye, A. O., Azeez, O. T., &amp; Yusuff, O. I. (2014). Perception of housing quality by residents and non-residents of Ibara housing estate, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria.American Journal of Human Ecology,3(3), 35-42.https://doi.org/10.11634/216796221504586</p><p >ArkuG., Luginaah I., &amp; Mkandawire P. (2011). Housing and health in contrasting neighbourhoods in Accra, Ghana,Journal of Social Science and Medicine,72(11), 1864-1872.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.023</p><p >Asiwaju-Bello, Y. A.,Olabode, F. O., Duvbiama, O. A., Iyamu, J. O., Adeyemo, A. A., &amp; Onigbinde, M. T. (2013).Hydrochemical Evaluation of Groundwater in Akure Area, Southwestern Nigeria, for Irrigation Purpose. European International Journal of Science and Technology,2(8), 235-249. Online:https://eijst.org.uk/images/frontImages/gallery/Vol._2_No._8/21.pdf. Accessed:September 26, 2021</p><p >Babalola,O. D., Ibem, E. O.,Olotuah,A. O., &amp; Fulani, O. A. (2016). Residents' Perception of Quality of Public Housing in Lagos, Nigeria.International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences,11(2), 583-598. Online:https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79124317.pdf. Accessed:September 26, 2021</p><p >Baer, W. C. (2014). Using housing quality to track change in the standard of living and poverty for seventeenth-century London.Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History,47(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2013.800801</p><p >Brkanic, I. (2017). Housing quality assessment criteria.Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS,8(14), 37-47.https://doi.org/10.13167/2017.14.5</p><p >Burgess, E. W. (1925).The City: Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behaviour in the Urban Environment. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.</p><p >Coker, A.,Awokola, O., Olomolaiye, P., &amp; Booth, C. (2008).Challenges of urban housing quality and its associations with neighbourhoods’ environments: Insights and experiences of Ibadan City, Nigeria.Journal of Environmental Health Research,7(1), 21-30.</p><p >CreativeResearch Systems.Sample Size Calculator.Online:https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed: September 16, 2021</p><p >Daniel, O. A. (2015). Urban extreme weather: a challenge for a healthy living environment in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.Climate, 3(4), 775-791. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli3040775</p><p >Eades, J. S. (1980).The Yoruba to‐day (Changing Culture Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p >Ezeanah, U. (2020). Quality Housing: Perception and Insights of People in Benin City, Nigeria.UrbanForum,32(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09409-1</p><p >Fadairo, G., &amp; Ganiyu, S. (2010). Effects of flooding on the built environment in Akure, Nigeria.In S. Laryea, R.T.F. Leiringer, and W. Hughes (eds.), Proceedings of the West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, Accra, Ghana,281–287,July 27-28, 2010.</p><p >Fakunle,A., Ogundare, J., Olayinka-Alli, L., Mayowa Aridegbe, M., Bello, T., Elujulo, O., &amp; Saliu, O. O. a. (2018).Housing Quality and Risk Factors Associated with Respiratory Health Conditions in Nigeria. In A. Almusaed, &amp; A. Almssad (Eds.), Housing. IntechOpen.https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78543</p><p >Fasakin, J. O.,Basorun, J. O., Bello, M. O., Enisan, O. F., Ojo, B., &amp; Popoola, O. O. (2018).Effect of Land Pricing on Residential Density Pattern in Akure, Nigeria.Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,5(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.51.4003</p><p >Filali, R. (2012). Housing conditions in Tunisia: The quantity–quality mismatch.Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,27(3), 317–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9271-z</p><p >Gnatiuk, O., &amp; Kryvets, O. (2018). Post-Soviet residential neighbourhoods in two second-order Ukrainian cities: Factors and models of spatial transformation.Geographica Pannonica,22(2), 104-120.https://doi.org/10.5937/22-17037</p><p >Gough, K. V., &amp; Yankson, P. W. (2000). Land Markets in African Cities: The Case of Peri-urban Accra,Ghana.Urban Studies, 37(13), 2485-2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080651</p><p >Haque, I., Rana, M. J., &amp; Patel, P. P. (2020).Location matters: Unravelling the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood level housing qualityin Kolkata, India.Habitat International,99, 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102157</p><p >Harris, C. D., &amp; Ullman, E. L. (1945). The Nature of Cities.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences,242(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624524200103</p><p >Hoyt, H. (1939).The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighbourhoods in American Cities.Washington: Federal Housing Administration.</p><p >Hsu, C. I., &amp; Guo, S. P. (2006). CBD Oriented Commuters &amp; Mode and Residential Location Choices in an Urban Area with surface Streets and Rail Transit Lines.Journal of Urban Planning and Development,132(4), 235-246.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:4(235)</p><p >Ibitoye M. O.,Aderibigbe O. G., Adegboyega S. A., &amp; Adebola A. O. (2017). Spatio-temporal Analysis of Land Surface Temperature Variations in the Rapidly Developing Akure and its Environs, Southwestern Nigeria using Land Sat Data. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management10(3), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v10i3.9</p><p >Jiboye, A. D. (2010). Post-occupancy evaluation of residential satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria: Feedback for residential improvement.Frontiers of Architectural Research,1(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.08.001</p><p >Jochem, W. C.,Bird, T. J., &amp; Tatem, A. J. (2018). Identifying residential neighbourhood types from settlement points in a machine learning approach.Computers, environment and urban systems,69, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.01.004</p><p >Kearney, A. (2006). Residential Development Patterns and Neighbourhood Satisfaction Impacts of Density and Nearby Nature.Environment and Behaviour,38(1), 112-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277607</p><p >Konadu-Agyemang, K. (2001). A survey of housing conditions and characteristics in Accra, an African city.Habitat International, 25(1), 15–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(00)00016-3</p><p >Kurniati, R., &amp; Erlambang, F. R. (2015).Changes the Pattern of Residential Space into CommercialSpace in Chinatown Semarang.Procedia Environmental Sciences, 23, 307-314.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.01.045</p><p >Morenikeji, W.,Umaru, E., Pai, H., Jiya, S., Idowu, O., &amp; Adeleye, B. M. (2017). Spatial analysis of housing quality in Nigeria.International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment,6(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.008</p><p >Myung-Jin,J. (2013). The effects of housing preference for an apartment on residential location choice in Seoul: A random bidding land use simulation approach.Land Use Policy, 35, 395-405.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.011</p><p >National Bureau of Statistics (2021).Demographic Statistics Bulletin. Nigeria: Abuja: Demographic Statistics Division.</p><p >National Population Commission of Nigeria (2006).2006 National Population Census Results. Abuja, National Office of Statistics.</p><p >OguV. I. (2002). Urban residential satisfaction and the planning implication in a developing world context: The example of Benin City, Nigeria,International Planning Studies, 7, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470220112599</p><p >Omole K. F. (2010). An Assessment of Housing Condition and Socio-Economic Life Styles of Slum Dwellers in Akure, Nigeria.Contemporary Management Research,6(4), 272-290. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.2980</p><p >Ondo State Government (2015).Ondo State Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources(OSMANR). Akure: Government Press.</p><p >Owoeye, J. &amp; Ogundiran, A. (2014). A study on housing and environmental quality of Moniya Community in Ibadan, Nigeria.Journal of Environment and Earth Science,4(13), 51-60.Online:https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234663526.pdf.Accessed: September 28, 2021.</p><p >Page, I. C. &amp; Gordon, G. (2017).What is Quality in Buildings?New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd.</p><p >Premier, A. (2021). Developing place attachment in high-density residential neighbourhoods in China: comparing the role of shared outdoor environments in two residential models in Qingdao.Sustainable Cities and Landscapes, University of Auckland, 1-10</p><p >Rajaei, S. A., &amp; Mansourian, H. (2017). Urban growth and housing quality in Iran.Social Indicators Research,131(2), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1260-2</p><p >Ren, H., Yuan, N. &amp; Hu, H. (2019). Housing quality and its determinants in rural China: a structural equation model analysis.Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,34(1), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9629-y</p><p >Salami, K. K. (2016). Housing facilities and realities of health of the elderly in Nigerian cities.Nigerian Journal of Economics and Social Studies,58(1), 53-75.Online:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330987051.Accessed: March 16, 2022</p><p >Satu, S. A., &amp; Chiu, R. L. (2019).Livability in dense residential neighbourhoodsof Dhaka.Housing Studies,34(3), 538-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1364711</p><p >Sinha, P., Verma, N. K., &amp; Ayele, E. (2016). Urban built-up area extraction and change detection of Adama municipal area using time-series Landsat images.International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS,5(8), 1886-1895. https://doi.org/10.23953/cloud.ijarsg.67</p><p >Streimikiene, D. (2015). Quality of life and housing.International Journal of Information and Education Technology,5(2), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.491</p><p >Sweis, R. J.,Shanak, R. O., El Samen, A. A., &amp; Suifan, T. (2014).Factors affecting quality in the Jordanian housing sector.International J. of Housing Markets and Analysis, 7, 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-01-2013-0004</p><p >Thomas, O. S. &amp; Hassan, O. A. (2018). Assessment ofFactors Influencing Housing Qualityin the Coastal Community.International Journal of Innovation and Sustainability,2, 1-8.Online SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3138142. Accessed:February 13, 2022</p><p >Wimalasena, N. N., Chang-Richards, A., Wang, K. &amp; Dirks, K., (2022). Housing quality indicators: A systematic review. In: Sandanayake, Y.G., Gunatilake, S. &amp; Waidyasekara, K.G.A.S. (eds).Proceedings of the 10th World Construction Symposium, pp. 531-544. June, 2022, Sri Lanka.https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2022.43</p><p >Yoade, A. O.,Adeyemi, O. O., &amp; Adeyemi, B. B. (2015).An assessment of housing and neighbourhood quality condition in Ilesa, Nigeria.Analele Universitatii Oradea,SeriaGeografie,25(2), 242-252.Online:http://istgeorelint.uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/anale.htm. Accessed: February 13, 2022.</p><p >Yoade, A., Adeyemi, O., &amp; Yoade, O. (2018). Assessment of Housing Quality in Ede, Nigeria.Asian Themes in Social Sciences Research, 1(2), 76–83.https://doi.org/10.33094/journal.139.2018.12.76.83</p><p >Zainal,N. R., Kaur, G., Ahmad, N. A., &amp; Khalili, J. M. (2012).Housing conditions and quality of life of the urban poor in Malaysia.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,50, 827-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.085</p><p >Zanon, S., Callegaro, N., &amp; Albatici, R. (2019). A novel approach for the definition of an integrated visual quality index for residential buildings.Applied Sciences,9(8), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081579</p><p >Zhonghua, H.,&amp;Xuejun, D. (2015).Assessment and determinants of residential satisfaction with public housing in Hangzhou, China.Habitat International,47, 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.025</p>
			</sec></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the African Regional Institute for Geospatial Information Science and Technology (AFRIGIST), Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife for providing relevant and necessary materials required for carrying out this study. Also, the author thanks the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and valuable suggestions.</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>