Evaluation of Aesthetic, Functional, and Environmental Effects on the Design of Urban Open Spaces: A Case Study of istanbul sishane Park, Turkey





Urban Public Spaces, Architectural Style, Aesthetic, Functional, Environmental Performance


Urban spaces reflect the reality of city life, like a mirror. This research aims to examine and analyze the advanced aesthetic, functional, and environmental performance of urban public spaces by assessing the current situation and highlighting the role of creativity in developing these spaces. To clarify the research scope, Şişhane Park in İstanbul, Turkey was studied to define the requirements of creative standards, evaluate these competencies and choose the appropriate architectural style and urban furniture. In addition, to learn ways of preserving those elements for longer life. The analytical descriptive approach was the research method utilized in order to arrive at a set of results that ascertain the reality of the aesthetic, functional, and environmental performance of urban public spaces, and the reflection of the contemporary role in developing these spaces, which can contribute to addressing weaknesses and bolster the strong points in the formation of public urban spaces around the world.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdullah, I. H. (2009). Aesthetic theory in the art of design. Modern Discussion, no.2677, (reference in Arabic). Available: http://www.ahewar.org/debat/show.art.asp?aid=175060

Al-Dweikat, Firas. (2009). Urban Public Spaces in the City of Nablus and their Development Physically and Visually "An analytical Study of the Eastern Complex Area". Nablus, Palestine. https://repository.najah.edu/handle/20.500.11888/7534

Al Farran, Hani. (2010). Determinants of Visual Design for Urban Public Spaces in the Arabic City. Journal of Urbanization and Urban Technologies: University of Messila, Algeria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259266740_Determinants_of_Visual_Design_for_Urban_Public_Spaces_in_the_Arabic_City

Alyari, Mehdi. (2018). Role of environmental psychology in strategic development of urban public spaces based on aesthetic needs of citizens. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health. https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal-5---urban-visual-perception.html

Barton, Hugh & Tsourou, Catherine (2000). Healthy urban planning. Spon press, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203857755

Blackburn, S. (1994). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borton & Mitchell, (2006). Inclusive Urban Design: Streets for Life. Architectural press: Linacre house, Jordan hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK.

Carmona, M & others. (2010). Public Spaces - Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Second Edition, Architectural Press:Great Britain.

Corbum, Jason. (2009). Toward the Healthy City: People, Places, and the Politics of Urban Planning. The MIT press. London, England.

Elmashad, Amr. (2011). Urban design standards and its implications for security in the new urban areas, PhD thesis. Helwan University, Egypt.

Gauzin-Müller, Dominique and Favet, Nicolas. (2002). Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism: Concepts, Technologies, Examples. Basel. Berlin. Boston.

Hahn, E. (1987). Oekologische Stadtplanung (paper on ecological urban planning). H&H, Frankfurt Am: Germany.

Jacobs, Allen and Appleyard. (1987). Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Planner's Notebook. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/293a/15cd8ad1e63d3676e577dca120872a80e771.pdf

Jacobs, Jane (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

Krier, R. (1991). Urban Space, Academy Education, London, p (15). https://tr.scribd.com/document/150062548/Rob-Krier-Urban-Space

Lynch, Kevin (1960). The Image of the City, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England.

Lynch, K., Hack, G. (1994). Site Planning. 3rd Ed. The MIT Press, London.

Nasar, Jack L. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nia, Hourakhsh Ahmad and Atun, Resmiye Alpar. (2015). Aesthetic design thinking model for urban environments: A survey based on a review of the literature. Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Salamis, Mersin, Gazimagusa 10, Turkey.

Punter & Carmona, (1997). The Design Dimension of Planning: Theory, content and best practice for. E and FN spon, London, UK. 20Dimension%20of%20Planning&f=false

Shaftoe, Henry. (2008). Convivial Urban Spaces. UK and USA.

Stevens, Quentin. (2006). The shape of urban experience: a reevaluation of Lynch's five elements. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume33, Pages 803-823. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/24bd/2ff2c02c6fb8d51db6edb406f5b094c9bf93.pdf

Tay, E, Canbay Türkyilmaz, Ç. (2018). Açik alan ergonomisine dair bir inceleme, şişhane parki ve katli otoparki [An examination on outdoor ergonomy, şişhane park and şişhane car park], Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 6 (0), 205-219. DOI: 10.21923/jesd.360652

Tibbalds, Francis. (1992). Making People-friendly Towns. Longman Group, UK, Ltd.

Turner, A. (1980). Cities of the Poor: settlement planning in developing countries, Croon Helm, London. https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.3.1.e0650507m8972807

Williams, Katie & others. (2000). Achieving Sustainable Urban Form. E & FN Spon, London and New York.




How to Cite

Caymaz, G. F. Y., & Hamameh, S. (2020). Evaluation of Aesthetic, Functional, and Environmental Effects on the Design of Urban Open Spaces: A Case Study of istanbul sishane Park, Turkey. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 4(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2020.v4n2-7