Towards Biodiverse Urban Public Spaces: A Morphological Study in Milan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n1-7Keywords:
Urban Biodiversity, Architectural Composition, Urban Design, Public Spaces, Urban MorphologyAbstract
This study explores the role of architectural composition and urban design in enhancing urban biodiversity, which is crucial for improving ecosystem services and overall urban sustainability. It addresses a gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence on how specific morphological characteristics in urban regeneration projects can support biodiversity, emphasizing the overlooked potential of architectural morphologies in urban greening strategies. Focusing on five recent urban regeneration projects in Milan, the study conducts a detailed analysis of built volumes and green areas. Quantitative measurements, such as green area compactness, perimeter edge continuity, and building front permeability, were combined with qualitative assessments to identify correlations between urban morphology and biodiversity potential. The analysis revealed three distinct urban morphologies—"Central Park," "Fluid Park," and "Garden Between Houses"—each offering unique conditions for accessibility and biodiversity development. These morphologies demonstrate varying capacities for conserving, promoting, and implementing urban biodiversity, depending on their interaction with the surrounding urban fabric. By establishing a clear correlation between urban morphology and biodiversity potential, this research highlights the critical role that architects and urban designers play in addressing the emerging challenge of enhancing urban biodiversity. It provides valuable insights for future urban regeneration projects aimed at fostering sustainable and biodiverse urban environments.
Downloads
References
Andersson, E. (2006). Urban Landscapes and Sustainable Cities. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01639-110134
Andersson, E., & Colding, J. (2014). Understanding How Built Urban Form Influences Biodiversity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(2), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.002
Aste, N., Del Pero, C., & Leonforte, F. (2022). Toward Building Sector Energy Transition. In M. Asif (A cura di), Handbook of Energy Transitions (p. 127-150). Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003315353-9
Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable, Resilient Cities. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328-3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328
Benelli, F., & Pellegrini, V. (2013). Morfotipologie urbane e vulnerabilità climatica [Urban morphotypologies and climate vulnerability]. In F. Musco, & E. Zanchini (A cura di), Le città cambiano il Clima (p. 86-91). Venezia: Corila.
Beumer, C., & Martens, P. (2015). Biodiversity in my (back)yard: towards a framework for citizen engagement in exploring biodiversity and ecosystem services in residential gardens. Sustain Sci, 10, 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0270-8
Caniggia, G. (1979). Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia [Architectural composition and building typology]. Venezia: Marsilio.
Comune di Milano, Laboratorio di progettazione urbana. (1995). Nove parchi per Milano [Nine parks for Milan]. Milano: Electa.
Corner, J. (2006). Terra Fluxus. In C. Waldheim (A cura di), The Landscape Urbanism Reader (p. 21-34). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Danley, B., & Widmark, C. (2016). Evaluating conceptual definitions of ecosystem services and their implications. Ecological Economics, 126, 132-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.003
Dipeolu, A. A., Akpa, O. M., & Fadamiro, A. J. (2020). Mitigating Environmental Sustainability Challenges and Enhancing Health in Urban Communities: The Multi-functionality of Green Infrastructure. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 4(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2020.v4n1-4
Dizdaroğlu, D. (2022). Developing Design Criteria for Sustainable Urban Parks. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 6(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n1-7
European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment. (2021). EU biodiversity strategy for 2030 – Bringing nature back into our lives. https://doi.org/10.2779/677548
Forman, R. T. (2008). Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning beyond the City. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754982
Forman, R. T. (2014). Urban Ecology: Science of Cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030472
Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S., Mata, L., Thomas, J., & Bekessy, S. A. (2018). Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design. Conservation Letter. A journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.1241
Hagan, S. (2014). Ecological Urbanism: The Nature of the City. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761480
Hauck, T., & Weisser, W. W. (2021). Animal-Aided Design in the living environment: Integrating the needs of animal species into the planning and design of urban open spaces. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/40503
Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Elements of biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.
Kirk, H., Garrard, G. E., Croeser, T., Backstrom, A., Berthon, K., Furlong, C., . . . Bekessy, S. A. (2021). Building biodiversity into the urban fabric: A case study in applying Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design (BSUD). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, 127176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127176
Konijnendijk, C. (2021). The 3-30-300 Rule for Urban Forestry and Greener Cities. Biophilic Cities Journal, 4(2). Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com
Lazzarini, L., Mahmoud, I. H., & Pastore, M. C. (2024). Urban planning for biodiversity. An assessment of green plans in Northern Italy. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 1, 45-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10197
Lucan, J. (2012). Où va la ville aujourd’hui? Formes urbaines et mixités [Where is the city headed today? Urban form and mix]. Paris: Éditions de la Villette.
Luederitz, C., Brink, E., Gralla, F., Hermelingmeier, V., Meyer, M., Niven, L., . . . von Wehrden, H. (2015). A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Ecosystem Services, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001
Marcus, L. (2008). Spatial capital – an outline of an analytical theory of urban form. In H. Tigran (A cura di), New Urbanism and Beyond. New York: Rizzoli.
Marcus, L., & Colding, J. (2011). Towards a spatial morphology of urban social–ecological systems. Conference Proceedings for the 18th International Conference on Urban Form, ISUF2011. Montreal: Concordia University.
Marinoni, G. (2007). Milan. An Evolving City. The changes in strategies of transformation from 1984 to 2007. Lotus navigator, 131, 132-141.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.
Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Jiborn, M., Wood, R., Többen, J., & Seto, K. C. (2018). Carbon footprints of 13 000 cities. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac72a
Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (A cura di). (2010). Ecological Urbanism. Harvard, Baden: Harvard University, Graduate school of design; Lars Müller Publishing.
Mostafavi, M., & Najle, C. (A cura di). (2003). Landscape Urbanism: A Manual for the Machinic Landscape. London: Architectural Association.
Muratori, S. (1963). Architettura e civiltà in crisi [Architecture and civilization in crisis]. Roma: Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica.
Palazzo, E. (2022). Bridging urban morphology and urban ecology: a framework to identify morpho-ecological periods and patterns in the urban ecosystem. Journal of Urban Ecology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac007
Pastore, M. C., & Lazzarini, L. (2024). Piani e strategie del verde per la biodiversità urbana [Green plans and strategies for urban biodiversity]. Urbanistica Informazioni, 313, 67-72.
Ronchi, S., & Salata, S. (2022). Insights for the Enhancement of Urban Biodiversity Using Nature-Based Solutions: The Role of Urban Spaces in Green Infrastructures Design. In I. H. Mahmoud, E. Morello, F. Lemes de Oliveira, & D. Geneletti (A cura di), Nature-based Solutions for Sustainable Urban Planning. Greening Cities, Shaping Cities (p. 47-68). Cham: Springer, Cham., 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89525-9_3
Ståhle, A. (2005). Mer park i tätare stad: Teoretiska och empiriska undersökningar av stadsplaneringens mått på friytetillgång [More park space in a denser city: Measuring open space accessibility and “smart growth”]. Licentiate thesis. Stockholm: School of Architecture, KTH.
Uwajeh, P. C., & Ezennia, I. S. (2018). The Socio-cultural and ecological perspectives on landscape and gardening in Urban Environment: A narrative review. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4673
Waldheim, C. (Ed.). (2006). The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
World Bank. (2021). A Catalogue of Nature-based Solutions for Urban Resilience. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/36507
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Assistant Prof. Dr. Fabio Lepratto, Assistant Prof. Dr. Francesca Zanotto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
