Introducing A Novel Compositional Data Analysis Framework for Measuring Land Use Mix in Station Areas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2026.v10n1-7

Keywords:

Land-Use Mix, Isometric Log Ratio Balances, Compositional Data Analysis, Shannon Entropy Index, Station Areas

Abstract

This study presents isometric log-ratio (ILR) balances derived from compositional data analysis (CoDA) as a novel framework for measuring the land-use mix, addressing the category insensitivity of the Shannon entropy index (SEI). Six ILR balances were constructed using a theory-driven Sequential Binary Partition of seven residential and commercial functional uses in station buffers within the Osaka Densely Inhabited Districts in Japan. The findings demonstrated that ILR balances successfully clustered three functionally distinct station-area typologies that align with urban outcomes. Comparative analysis of ILR balances and the Shannon entropy index revealed an inverted U-shaped ILR–SEI relationship, demonstrating that ILRs can distinguish compositionally distinct buffers with identical entropy scores. ILR balances further elucidated the sub-component-level interactions, which are masked by the single index of Shannon entropy. Overall, the findings suggest that ILR balances effectively complement the Shannon entropy index by providing category-sensitive directional measurement of functional mix and hierarchical sub-compositional decomposition, offering a more complete and planning-relevant characterization of functional land-use composition around transit stations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aitchison, J. (1982). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 44(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x

Akyol, M. A., Duzgun, S., & Baykal, N. (2024). landusemix: A Python package for calculating land use mix. SoftwareX, 27, Article 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101861

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674730854

Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

Anderson, M. J., Ellingsen, K. E., & McArdle, B. H. (2006). Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters, 9(6), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x

Bardaka, E. (2024). Transit-induced gentrification and displacement: Future directions in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 44(3), 567–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2282285

Bertolini, L. (1999). Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice & Research, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459915724

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6

Chatman, D. G., & Noland, R. B. (2011). Do public transport improvements increase agglomeration economies? A review of literature and an agenda for research. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.587908

Chen, Y., & Song, Y. (2021). From measuring land use mix to measuring land use pattern: New methods for assessing land use. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.10383

Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2017). What is functional mix? An assemblage approach. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1281996

Egozcue, J. J., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2005). Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, 37(7), 795–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-7381-9

Egozcue, J. J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., & Barceló-Vidal, C. (2003). Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, 35(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023818214614

Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., & Templ, M. (2018). Applied compositional data analysis: With worked examples in R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96422-5

Gao, Y., Cui, X., & Sun, X. (2024). Land use characteristics of commuter rail station areas and their impact on station ridership: A case study of Japan Railways in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Land, 13(12), Article 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122045

Grunsky, E., Greenacre, M., & Kjarsgaard, B. (2024). GeoCoDA: Recognizing and validating structural processes in geochemical data: A workflow on compositional data analysis in lithogeochemistry. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 22, Article 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2023.100149

Gu, X., Lin, S., & Wang, C. (2024). Integrated impact of urban mixed land use on TOD ridership: A multi-radius comparative analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 17(1), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2462

Ibraeva, A., Correia, G. H. de A., Silva, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2020). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018

Im, H. N., & Choi, C. G. (2019). The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix. Urban Studies, 56(9), 1865–1881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018763319

Jiao, J., Rollo, J., & Fu, B. (2021). The hidden characteristics of land-use mix indices: An overview and validity analysis based on the land use in Melbourne, Australia. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041898

Kahatagahawatte, B., Matsunaka, R., Uno, N., & Nishigaki, T. (2025). A CoDA-based analysis of the influence of train network centrality on urban functional use composition in station buffers. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of the Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies (HKSTS), Paper 219.

Kashef, M. (2023). Mixed-use and street network attributes of vibrant urban settings. Architecture and Urban Planning, 19(1), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2023-0017

Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6%3C441::AID-SMJ819%3E3.0.CO;2-G

Khan, F. M., Pafka, E., & Dovey, K. (2022). Extremes of mixed-use architecture: A spatial analysis of vertical functional mix in Dhaka. City, Territory and Architecture, 9(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00177-y

Kida, M., Merder, J., Dittmar, T., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. J. (2026). Reframing natural organic matter research through compositional data analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 14, Article 1724142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1724142

Kim, J. H., & Li, X. (2021). Building more housing near transit: A spatial analysis of residential densification dynamics. Transport Policy, 114, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.018

Kretzer, G., Kanashiro, M., & Tibiriçá, R. (2023). Complementarity between urban land uses: A temporal analysis. Journal of Urban Design, 29(4), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2023.2280272

Kumakoshi, Y., Koizumi, H., & Yoshimura, Y. (2021). Diversity and density of urban functions in station areas. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 89, Article 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101679

Legendre, P. (2018). Numerical ecology. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10595-0

Martín-Fernández, J. A., Vidal, C. B., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2003). Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets using nonparametric imputation. Mathematical Geology, 35(3), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023866030544

Mohabey, D. P., Nongkynrih, J. M., & Kumar, U. (2023). Urban growth trend analysis of proposed Greater Silchar City, India, using landscape metrics and Shannon entropy model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(10), 25335–25366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03681-4

Motieyan, H., & Azmoodeh, M. (2021). Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern: A case study in Tehran, Iran. Land Use Policy, 109, Article 105724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105724

Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Buccianti, A. (Eds.). (2011). Compositional data analysis: Theory and applications. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119976462

Pearson, K. (1897). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 60(359–367), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1896.0076

Pedreira, J. U., Louro, T. V., Assis, L. B. M. D., Brito, P. L., & Bomfim, F. G. (2026). BGBI: A citywide-referenced and bidirectional land use mix index for planning and policy evaluation. Land Use Policy, 169, Article 108135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108135

Raj, S. I., Mohino, I., & Khatun, F. (2024). Socio-economic impact of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system in Dhaka: A case study of Mirpur stations. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 8(2), 436–459. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n2-9

Thomas-Agnan, C., Laurent, T., Ruiz-Gazen, A., Nguyen, T. H. A., Chakir, R., & Lungarska, A. (2021). Spatial simultaneous autoregressive models for compositional data: Application to land use. In P. Filzmoser, K. Hron, J. A. Martín-Fernández, & J. Palarea-Albaladejo (Eds.), Advances in compositional data analysis (pp. 225–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71175-7_12

Wu, J., Jia, P., Feng, T., Li, H., & Kuang, H. (2023). Spatiotemporal analysis of built environment restrained traffic carbon emissions and policy implications. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 121, Article 103839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103839

Yang, H., Li, X., Li, C., Huo, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). How do different treatments of catchment area affect the station level demand modeling of urban rail transit? Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, Article 2763304. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2763304

Yang, Y., Zhong, C., & Gao, Q.-L. (2022). An extended node-place model for comparative studies of transit-oriented development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 113, Article 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103514

Yoshida, T., & Tsutsumi, M. (2018). On the effects of spatial relationships in spatial compositional multivariate models. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 11(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-017-0199-5

Zhao, X., Xia, N., & Li, M. (2023). 3-D multi-aspect mix degree index: A method for measuring land use mix at street block level. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 104, Article 102005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.102005

Zhuo, Y., Jing, X., Wang, X., Li, G., Xu, Z., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). The rise and fall of land use mix: Review and prospects. Land, 11(12), Article 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122198

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Kahatagahawatte, B., Matsunaka, R., Uno, N., & Nishigaki, T. (2026). Introducing A Novel Compositional Data Analysis Framework for Measuring Land Use Mix in Station Areas. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 10(1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2026.v10n1-7

Plaudit