AI-Assisted Planning for Sustainable Urbanism: Mapping Urban Livability in a Contemporary American City through Tree Coverage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2026.v10n2-5Keywords:
Urban Livability, Tree Coverage, AI-assisted Planning, Spatial Analysis, Machine Learning, Environmental ResilienceAbstract
This study explores the integration of artificial intelligence, spatial analysis, and urban design to evaluate and enhance urban livability while addressing socio-economic and environmental vulnerabilities in contemporary cities. Using Austin, Texas, as a case study, the research combines ArcGIS-based spatial analysis with AI-assisted modeling to examine environmental, socio-economic, and infrastructural datasets, with urban tree canopy coverage serving as a key indicator of neighborhood health and equity. A hexagonal tessellation grid is developed to break down census tract data into standardized spatial units. This allows vulnerability scores to be calculated and correlated with tree coverage. Machine-learning techniques, including regression-based predictive modeling, are applied to identify patterns of vulnerability and forecast future urban conditions using survey-based and real-time data inputs. The findings demonstrate that an integrated GIS–AI workflow effectively reveals socio-spatial disparities in urban livability, paving the way for sustainable urban design, scientific zoning strategies, and informed form-based coding interventions.
Downloads
References
American Planning Association. (2021). Environmental justice and zoning reform (PAS Report). American Planning Association. https://www.planning.org/publications/report/9295614/
Birch, C. P. D., Oom, S. P., & Beecham, J. A. (2007). Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 206(3–4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.041
Bixler, R. P., & Yang, E. (2019). Social vulnerability in Texas: Implications for resilience, equity, and climate policy (pp. 1–21). Planet Texas 2050, The University of Texas at Austin. https://tmo.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/Texas%20Social%20Vulnerability%20Report.V4.pdf
Borges, H. F. (2012). Connecting infrastructure and urbanism (pp. 1–16). Universitat Politècnica de València.
Brunetta, G., & Salata, S. (2019). Mapping Urban Resilience for Spatial Planning-A First Attempt to Measure the Vulnerability of the System. Sustainability, 11(8), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082331
Cacciatore, S., Mao, S., Nuñez, M. V., Massaro, C., Spadafora, L., Bernardi, M., Perone, F., Sabouret, P., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Banach, M., Calvani, R., Matteo Tosato, Marzetti, E., & Landi, F. (2025). Urban health inequities and healthy longevity: traditional and emerging risk factors across the cities and policy implications. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03052-1
Chaturvedi, V., & de Vries, W. T. (2021). Machine Learning Algorithms for Urban Land Use Planning: A Review. Urban Science, 5(3), 68, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5030068
Fulton, A. J., Ries, P. D, & Riley, G. E. (2025). Where Are the Benefits of Trees Needed Most? A Comparison of Equity-Based Mapping Tools in Austin, Texas. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2025.020
Galderisi, A., & Limongi, G. (2021). A Comprehensive Assessment of Exposure and Vulnerabilities in Multi-Hazard Urban Environments: A Key Tool for Risk-Informed Planning Strategies. Sustainability, 13(16), 9055, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169055
Janowicz, K., Gao, S., McKenzie, G., Hu, Y., & Bhaduri, B. (2020). GeoAI: Spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1684500
Kaczmarek, I., Świąder, M., Hełdak, M., & Prezioso, M. (2025). Addressing Urban Vulnerability: A Comprehensive Approach. Land, 14(8), 1527, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14081527
Locke, D. H., Hall, B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., Ogden, L. A., Aoki, C., Boone, C. G., & O'Neil-Dunne, J. P. M. (2021). Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US cities. npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 15, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00022-0
Monzur, T., Tabassum, T., & Bashir, N. (2024). Alternative Tessellations for the Identification of Urban Employment Subcenters: A Comparison of Triangles, Squares, and Hexagons. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 8(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-024-00200-5
Mutambik, I. (2024). Assessing Urban Vulnerability to Emergencies: A Spatiotemporal Approach Using K-Means Clustering. Land, 13(11), 1744, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111744
Pugh, C. D. J. (1996). Sustainability, the environment and urbanization. Earthscan.
Reckien, D. (2018). What is in an index? Construction method, data metric, and weighting scheme determine the outcome of composite social vulnerability indices in New York City. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1273-7
Roy, P., Abdullah, M., & Siddique, I. (n.d.). Machine learning empowered geographic information systems: Advancing Spatial analysis and decision making. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024(01), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.1200
Schwarz, K., Fragkias, M., Boone, C. G., Zhou, W., McHale, M., Grove, J. M., O'Neil-Dunne, J., McFadden, J. P., Buckley, G. L., Childers, D., Ogden, L., Pincetl, S., Pataki, D., Whitmer, A., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2015). Trees grow on money: Urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0122051, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
UN-Habitat. (2016). World cities report 2016: Urbanization and development — Emerging futures. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2016
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities just green enough. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
Xiu, C., Cheng, L., Song, W., & Wu, W. (2011). Vulnerability of large city and its implication in urban planning: A perspective of intra-urban structure. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0451-7
Xofi, M., Domingues, J. C., Santos, P. P., Pereira, S., Oliveira, S. C., Reis, E., José Luís Zêzere, Ricardo, Lourenço, P. B., & Ferreira, T. M. (2022). Exposure and physical vulnerability indicators to assess seismic risk in urban areas: a step towards a multi-hazard risk analysis. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1), 1154–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2068457
Zhao, C., Weng, Q., & He, Z. (2024). Spatiotemporal analysis of underlying factors in urban transformations: Quantifying the importance of urban plan intentions in the Austin Metropolitan Area, Texas. Land Use Policy, 149, 1–12. Sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107415
Zhou, W., Huang, G., Pickett, S. T. A., Wang, J., Cadenasso, M. L., McPhearson, T., Grove, J. M., & Wang, J. (2021). Urban tree canopy has greater cooling effects in socially vulnerable communities in the US. One Earth, 4(12), 1764–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.010
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kunth Shah, Edwin Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
