Thinking on the Correlation Between Bauhaus and Computational Design Education




Bauhaus, Computational Thinking, Computational Design Education, Digital Design, Digital Revolution


This study assesses that there are similarities between the Bauhaus movement and computational design. The similarities are discussed under the titles of hands-on activities, interdisciplinary studies and relation with technology for both Bauhaus and computational design. Digital technology is changing rapidly, and to catch the developing technology up the education system must be updated. Bauhaus can be a pathfinder for computational design education. Within this context, three educational organizations, KTU CODE FAB, IAAC and ICD, which were experienced personally, are examined. As a result of the study, it is reduced that; the innovative spirit of Bauhaus, which focuses on doing and hands-on activities, is also important for computational design education. The well-trained architects that accustomed to the new technology can be graduated with the integration with industry, similarly to the Bauhaus system.


Download data is not yet available.


Albers, J. (2014). Josef Albers: Minimal means, maximum effect. Madrid: Fundacion .

Bayer, H., Gropius, I., & Gropius, W. (1938). Bauhaus: 1919-1928. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.

Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. Retrieved from

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Indianapolis: Kappa Delta Pi.

FabLabs (n.d.). I'm new here. What's a FabLab?. Retrieved from

FabLabs (n.d.). Map view [Digital image]. Retrieved from

Gropius, W. (1919). Bauhaus manifesto and program. Retrieved from

Gropius, W. (1965). The new architecture and the Bauhaus (Vol. 21). MIT press.

Hochman, E. S., & Ashton, D. (1997). Bauhaus: Crucible of modernism. New York: Fromm International.

IAAC (n.d.). 3D Printing with soild and natural materials [Digital image]. Retrieved from

ICD (n.d.). ICD/ITKE research pavilion 2013/14, design society [Digital image]. Retrieved from

Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Evaluating constructivistic learning. In T.M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, (pp. 137–148).

Kolarevic, B. (2003). Digital production. In Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Peter, J. (1994). The oral history of modern architecture: interviews with the greatest architects of the twentieth century (Vol. 1). Harry N Abrams Inc.

Pye, D. (1978). Nature and aesthetics of design. London: Herbert Press Limited.

Salama, A. (1995). New trends in architectural education: Designing the design studio. North Carolina: Tailored Text and Unlimited Potential Publishing.

Siebenbrodt, M., & Schöbe, L. (2009). Bauhaus (1st ed.). New York: Parkstone Press.




How to Cite

Oktan, S., & Vural, S. (2019). Thinking on the Correlation Between Bauhaus and Computational Design Education. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 3(3), 27–38.