Some Notes about Architecture, Urbanism and Economy
Abstract
The economy can be considered as the transversal component of the human activities over territories. This fact can be observed from a diachronic perspective: the way how architectural typologies arose through history. But the relations between Economy and Architecture are not only established by the small scales but the larger ones. Cities and territories evolved from compact forms till spreading ones in a parallel way to the arousal of the shopping areas. Urban sprawl could never be understood without these new typologies. The paper is based on the keynote speech was held in the International seminar “Economy today” last September 2017 in Andrićgrad (Bosnia and Herzegovina). It is divided into two blocks: the first one relates to a general review of the historical reflections of this relation with a special mention to the consequences of an economic crisis either in the landscape or urban scales. The second part, partially included in the conclusions, reflects on the necessary changes in the university curriculums for a better visualization of this relation. It would imply new attitudes able to explain most of the architectural processes as the formal result of a larger interaction.
References
Adedeji, J. A. & Arayela, O. (2017). Urban Renewal Strategies and Economic Growth in Ondo State, Nigeria: A Case Study. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs (JCUA), 2(1), 76-83. Doi: 10.25034/ijcua.2018.3662
Dobbs R., Smit S., Remes J., Manyika J., Roxburgh Ch., Restrepo A. (2011).Urban world: Mapping the economic power of cities
Iranfar, M. (2018). The Presence of Modernist Architecture in Government’s educational Buildings at Lefkoşa. Contemporary Urban Affairs (JCUA), 2(1), 13-21. Doi: 10.25034/ijcua.2018.3653
Luke, T. (2003). Global Cities vs. “global cities:" Rethinking Contemporary Urbanism as Public Ecology, in Studies in Political Economy 70, Spring 2003
Molotch H. (1976). The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82, No. 2 (Sep., 1976), pp. 309-332
Mumford, E. (2000). The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928–1960. Cambridge: MIT Press
Smith, N. (2002). New Globalism, New Urbanism:”Gentrification As A Global Urban Strategy ” in Antipode, Volume 34, Issue 3, July 2002 Pages 427–450