Livable city one step towards sustainable development

Main Article Content

Farzaneh Sasanpour, Dr.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-7806

Abstract

Cities are the engines of economic growth. According to the United Nations, Today the global urban population is expected to reach 3 billion to 5 billion (61 percent) by 2030.The industrial revolution and the resulting economic-social changes led to the transformation of residential patterns and living patterns. Due to the increasing development of cities and its problems, the theory of sustainable development followed by the approach of the livable city was considered. Livable city environment with good planning is an attractive and safe environment for life, work and development, including good governance, competitive economy, high quality of life and environmental sustainability. The results indicate that the social, economic and environmental aspects of livability of the city of Arak are moderate and unfavorable. Also, the results of the Topsis model, which is a multi-criteria and decision-making model, show that in the environmental dimension of the region two with a score of 0.6859 and in the social dimension of the region of three with a score of 0.92 and in the economic dimension of the region three with a score of 1, the highest rank Have won. As a result, the city of Arak ranked 58th, is not livable and of the three city areas, zone 3 is closer to the surface of livable. And this process will not be in the path of sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sasanpour, F. (2017). Livable city one step towards sustainable development. International Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1(3), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3673
Section
Articles

References

Allen, T. F. H. (2010). “Making Livable Sustainable Systems Unremarkable.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27 (5), 469–79.

Badland, H. Whitzman, C., Aye, L., Butterworth, H. (2014) Urban Liveability: Emerging Lesson from Australian for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science and Medicine, (111), 64-73.

Gough, M. Z. (2015). Reconciling Livability and Sustainability: Conceptual and Practical Implications for Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 145–160.

Holden, M., and Scerri, A. (2013). “More Than This: Liveable Melbourne Meets Liveable Vancouver.” Cities, 31, 444–53.

Lennard, H. L. (1997)."Principles for the Livable City" In Lennard, S.H., S Von UngernSternberg, H.L.Lennard (Eds), Making Cities Livable. International Making Cities LivableConferences. California, Usa: Gondolier Press.

Maslow, A. H. (1998). Toward a Psychology of Being, 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley.

Miller, H. J., Witlox, F., and Tribby, C. P. (2013). Developing Context-Sensitive Livability Indicators for Transportation Planning: A Measurement Framework.” Journal of Transport Geography 26, 51–64.

Portney, K. (2013). Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ruth, M., and Franklin, R. S. (2013). Livability for All? Conceptual Limits and Practical Implications. Applied Geography 49, 18–23.

Sasanpour, F., Simin, T., Hamza, J.A. (2015), Measuring and assessing urban livability in twenty-two regions of Tehran metropolitan area. Regional Planning Quarterly, 18, 42-27.

Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Arak Population Census.

Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., and de Hollander, A.(2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well- Being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65 (2), 5–18.